|
||||
Re: Who plans to go HD2?
Quote:
T-Mobile and their reliability and speed sucks FOR YOU and one of your girls. Don't make claims that are more than that. I'm sorry for YOUR bad experience. |
|
||||
Re: Who plans to go HD2?
Quote:
|
|
||||
Re: Who plans to go HD2?
Quote:
http://coverage.sprint.com/IMPACT.jsp http://www.wireless.att.com/coverageviewer/#?type=voice http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/C...atorController http://www.t-mobile.com/coverage/pcc.aspx http://vzwmap.verizonwireless.com/do...comparison.pdf Last edited by rorytmeadows; 12-31-2009 at 12:36 PM. |
|
||||
Re: Who plans to go HD2?
Quote:
|
|
||||
Re: Who plans to go HD2?
Quote:
As far as nationwide coverage goes Tmobile isn't there. I'm sure there are areas other carriers suck as well. Oh well. I'm sure in the areas where Tmobile covers, their customers are happy. Done. For me, switching to Tmobile for a phone would be a case of paying more for less service. Coverage sucks in my area, and is not as reliable as the other carriers, and EDGE sucks.
__________________
Phones: Motorola MicroTAC 650E, Qualcomm/Kyocera QCP 860, Sanyo SCP-4700, Sanyo SCP-4900, Samsung A500, Sanyo MM-7400, Sanyo MM-7500, Samsung APH A900M, LG Fusic, LG Musiq, HTC Apache, Palm Centro, Samsung Rant, HTC Mogul, HTC Diamond, HTC Touch Pro, HTC Touch Pro 2. Samsung Moment, HTC Evo 4G
|
|
||||
Re: Who plans to go HD2?
There's no point in trying to debate that verizon has the best network no matter which way you put it... just like there's no way you can debate the fact that T-mobile has the worst and their 3G coverage in most places is laughable. Like I said... i've had both services and have done a bit of traveling and its no contest on which service had better coverage FOR ME.
|
|
||||
Re: Who plans to go HD2?
Quote:
|
|
||||
Re: Who plans to go HD2?
Quote:
They cover 30 or 50 metropolitan areas (I can't remember which, and it's all of the major metro areas in the US), and Verizon wins for coverage, call reliability, call quality, and in other areas. I think the only area where they were regularly beat was in data access speeds. |
|
|
|