|
||||
new ecare email
just got a new email,
getting a 175 credit on the touch after i pay full price at a shop. its been such a weird ordeal, i dont know if i should be slightly pissed or slightly happy. Both i guess. ?) |
|
||||
Damn. Sorry to hear you haven't been as lucky as some of us.
It only took me one email to ecare after two calls to retention that failed. |
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
||||
Quote:
"Sorry sir, you're going to have to inconvenience yourself for a few months until we fix what should have worked perfectly when we released the phone."
__________________
HTC EVO 4G - Fresh 0.3
|
|
||||
After an initial run-around with eCare and Retentions I called in again to Retentions and apparently hit the jackpot. (This started with a Mogul that I received as an in-store replacement for a bad PPC-6700 in August)
First round via e-mail was a dead end. Just a promised call back from a CS rep after about 10 e-mails. Second round with Retentions resulted in the rep attempting to get Asurion to replace my Mogul. They would have none of it. End result - go to a repair center and get a replacement Mogul. This I did, but the new Mogul had the same bad bluetooth. This led to... Round three - Retentions. I called in and was immediately offered a replacement phone of my choosing. I chose the Touch and received it the next day (brand new, in retail box). There was no mention of returning my Mogul and I have not received a return kit. So after dealing with Sprint for far longer than I thought necessary, it seems that I not only got a new Touch, but also won't need to sent the Mogul back (though I'll be watching my upcoming bill closely). I have no idea how Sprint decides how to take care of customers - perhaps the CS reps have a Magic 8-Ball with different options: "Sorry - you'll need to go though Asurion!", "Pick a new phone!", "Sorry - you're f-ed!". It seems complete arbitrary. The only thing I can figure is that against my instincts I actually went to the repair center and had my Mogul swapped before calling in again with the same problem. |
|
|
|