|
||||
Re: Warez Vs. Tethering
Quote:
|
|
||||
Re: Warez Vs. Tethering
Quote:
|
|
||||
Re: Warez Vs. Tethering
Yes. You're close but still wrong to say "everyone" falls under the hat.
Just like your OP, there are exception to the rule. There is a grey area. Its up to you to make sure you get your legal entitlements. I did & I will continue to excercise them to the fullest. In your defence: Its the cap there. Yes. Is it for everyone? No. Your poof is right there, clean as day. I clearly p***** the cap & I expect to do it next month. Is what I'm getting fair? Ask Sprint... |
|
||||
Re: Warez Vs. Tethering
Quote:
|
|
||||
Re: Warez Vs. Tethering
is this want u guys want? ICS hack may/ or not be stealing/supplying/ or cracking software.. but as i wanted to establish.. were still stealing period.. laws or no laws, cuz like coz said, noone has ever asked ppc "offically" to put up that notice, ppc did it on their own..
so just because noones asked this subject of thethering to be "offically" removed, why cant it also now become a seperate banned topic now as well, due to the fact we are stealing... and the point of warez is also about stealing.. so its 2 different topics, but the same basic principal as theft in both cases of warez and tethering.. so why cant the topics both be banned... ppc chose to make a stand against warez on their own, im asking them to stand against this on their own as well.. |
|
||||
Re: Warez Vs. Tethering
Quote:
|
|
||||
Re: Warez Vs. Tethering
Quote:
|
|
||||
Re: Warez Vs. Tethering
He wasn't cut off, but merely warned that he is going to be charged for PAM service. Not to mention that he didn't say that he went over the 5GB limit and only that he Telus noticed this PAM usage.
|
This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
Re: Warez Vs. Tethering
Quote:
never said he was cut off.. your guys point is cell companies dont care, well in his/this case TELUS does at the moment.. |
|
|
|