|
||||
Re: [JUL 12] *11 Radios Available* Updated Touch Pro CDMA Radio Archive Thread
i know online speedtests cant be too accurate but they give a rough estimate how well something is performing at a given time, i put a disclaimer in my post mentioning that in no way were these scientific tests....but u can clearly see that the 2 new radios are far faster than the stock rom
__________________
|
|
||||
Re: [JUL 12] *11 Radios Available* Updated Touch Pro CDMA Radio Archive Thread
Quote:
I wanted to cull the the spread of misinformation before it got out of hand, as it almost always does when discussing this topic. I wanted to list the most common sources of inaccuracy, and explain *why* they were inaccurate, so that people reading would stop relying on them. I also wanted to provide a non technical way that ppl could test the radios, without needing a degree in network engineering, and wireless physics, that would still provide a *VERY* meaningful, and helpful contribution to the community as a whole, as well as for themselves. That being said, I re-read my post, and while I certainly did not intend to sound demeaning, and don't really think I was tbh, there are phrases I could have worded a bit more softly, and would have changed some of the wording in the second paragraph in particular. For that, I apologize. |
|
||||
Re: [JUL 12] *11 Radios Available* Updated Touch Pro CDMA Radio Archive Thread
Quote:
But thanks for the support I am currently testing the new Altell one, but I dont have enough info yet to make any kind of determination, just *barely* flashed it. Last edited by MACE; 07-13-2009 at 06:30 AM. Reason: Decided Tommy's answer was long enough that he deserved his own post, as well as for clarity |
|
||||
Re: [JUL 12] *11 Radios Available* Updated Touch Pro CDMA Radio Archive Thread
Quote:
As far as the meaningfulness of your particular tests, even though they were done as close to back to back as you could (considering you had to flash in between each) I'm sorry to have say this, but, unfortunately, due to the currently very low capacity of most wireless networks backhaul, as well as a host of other contributing factors, even back to back tests can vary by rather significant amounts, even if you have an *excellent* signal, and everything on your end is working perfectly. For example, there have been a number of times where I have seen my bandwidth go from 2.5-3Mbps to 1mbps, or even less than 1, and then back to 2mbps or so in a matter of 10 minutes or less. And it is fairly normal for your average bandwidth to vary by at least .1 to .3mbps especially if you are in a metropolitan area. On perhaps a more helpful note, I did notice your latency was *extremely* high. You should check to make sure it is nothing on your end, (the most common cause of this is spyware) and if not, call your provider, and tell them about it. If it is on their end, they *definitely* need to fix it, 300+ ms on EVDO is pretty bad, and 600+ is pretty much intolerable, and almost guaranteed, if your latency is that high, whatever problem is causing it is most likely limiting your bandwidth significantly as well. I would not be surprised to see up to even a 1mbps increase, if you get that cleared up, unless it is just fuxxed network settings on your machine. I hope that this helps. [Edit] I just noticed that in your sig, that you had over 500 ms latency in one of your Road Runner tests. If this was done any time reasonably recently, it *strongly* suggests a problem on your end, so I would recommend trying a hardcore malware test first, if you come to the conclusion that is not likely, then check your network settings for a ridiculously huge mtu size, this is something that some tweak programs do for a slight boost in download speed, at a large cost in latency, but I have never seen it account for more than maybe 100ms lag at the most tbh, the only thing that I have seen nuke a connection that badly (from 20-30ms to over 500) is pretty much spyware. Your low upload speeds are also indicative of this. Sorry if this is the case, but hopefully it at least helps you figure it out. Last edited by MACE; 07-13-2009 at 07:16 AM. |
|
||||
Re: [JUL 12] *11 Radios Available* Updated Touch Pro CDMA Radio Archive Thread
ok i did the ##33284# so which is more important 1x or hdr & what is hdr?
|
|
||||
Re: [JUL 12] *11 Radios Available* Updated Touch Pro CDMA Radio Archive Thread
One of the things I notice may be a good test is how battery life is with a particular radio.
Only problem with that is that the rom you are using has a bigger impact on battery, so you should not change rom OS when testing. That and "dead zones" is prob a good test. I'll never 4get the funny post in an old thread where the dudes testing location was on his toilet seat. If it past that test, then it was good. Last edited by Maxx134; 07-13-2009 at 10:17 AM. Reason: typo |
|
||||
Re: [JUL 12] *11 Radios Available* Updated Touch Pro CDMA Radio Archive Thread
figured out my battery problem...im getting high 90's dbm with most radios 1x & 85-90 hdr in my room, but in my living room im getting 76
|
|
||||
Re: [JUL 12] *11 Radios Available* Updated Touch Pro CDMA Radio Archive Thread
i to have flashed to mr6 and my signal strength is very poor....also im on 1X all the time and RA is completly gone .......i flashed to newest vzw radio not much improvement at all and still no RA any suggestions
|
|
|
|