|
||||
Re: Warez Vs. Tethering
Quote:
i can totally set up a cell phone to only have a pam plan and not a voice,text, or regular data plan.. also, havent u read the posts where people are talking about their sprint service being cancelled, yet wmwifi provides them access to tether still... what "exsisting connection" is he usuing for that to happen.. PAM is independent.. and 2nd highlight...umm thats skype right? so TELUS does take a stand on that particular issue... so thats not a legal alterative so to speak..
__________________
"Theres a thin line between Genius and Insanity"
"If Silence is Golden, than Making Noise is Platinum" -Tech N9ne "This Ring" "The world is Bianary, your either a 1 or a 0.. -Tim Robbins in the movie "Anti Trust" "Lose?..I Dont Lose!.....I Win.....I Win.....Im a Lawyer, Thats My Job and Thats What I Do" -Keanu Reeves "Devils Advocate" |
|
||||
Re: Warez Vs. Tethering
Quote:
ICS shares an existing network connection on your phone over BT PAN or USB RNDIS. Nothing more. ICS Can "make" a connection if your phone is currently not connected. If it has to, it will connect using whichever profile is specified in the registry. By default that is named PAM. The reg edit changes that to SPRINT. BOTH just dial #777 to make a ppp connection. There is an additional change which involves either preventing a service from starting or deleting the dll which some people seem to think makes the connection work more reliably. It is a placebo, but if it makes you happy go for it. I suppose if your device did not have a profile named PAM it would fail out of the box. If so, make a new profile that is a copy of sprint, named PAM. This is not magic or rocket science or deep leet haxxor skils. This is just out of the box functionality of Windows Mobile. Again, if you believe editing the registry without installing any additional software is cracking or a keygen, then you're totally nuts. TOS violation, yes. Warez, no.
__________________
|
|
||||
Re: Warez Vs. Tethering
we are editing the registry of MS' copyrighted version of ICS that is on our cell phones.. Im sure MS says thats a big no no.. did they give you permission to edit their licensed software? nope! did they give juicy permission to edit their licensed software? nope!
|
|
||||
Re: Warez Vs. Tethering
wow, you really are gonna go after roms next, arent you?
and ms doesnt care if you edit the registry, editing base code on the other hand they frown upon. Also i remember reading the gave juicy crap bc he was using code that wasnt released yet, as wm 6.5 |
|
||||
Re: Warez Vs. Tethering
Quote:
|
|
||||
Re: Warez Vs. Tethering
Quote:
As for WMWifi zombifying service, I'll believe that when I see it. Im hoping you now know your egal footing. If anything, sleep better at night knowing WMWifi isnt illegal and the extent of your rights with Windows Mobile. If you still feel guilty, pay for PAM or be like me and use use a U727 usb air card. Seriously I hope I helped you understand this better. |
|
||||
Re: Warez Vs. Tethering
Quote:
again, i dont care about roms... theres no way to pay for it.. but there are plenty of ways to pay for your phone to tether to a laptop/pc though our carriers.. |
|
||||
Re: Warez Vs. Tethering
Quote:
|
|
||||
Re: Warez Vs. Tethering
using a reg edit or a hack to use copyrighted software without paying for it is against copyright laws. using a hack to get a SERVICE to which you may not be entitled is totally different. not neccessarily more legal, just not illegal to discuss.
we could legally discuss the uses and how to with warez. however distributing the software itself (in a cracked state, not referring to shareware here) or serials/keygens (which circumvent copy protection, violating copyright laws) is not legal. in escense, we can legally discuss how to obtain illegal software and how to do other illegal things. the discussion is not whats ILLEGAL. the instructions on how to do warez and bypass copyright protection is not ILLEGAL. posting warez themselves or the serials keygens themselves is whats illegal. That said, the site mods and admin can restrict if more if they like as terms of using the site, its their perogative. So if they want to completely ban discussing how to break copyright protection, thats up to them. however they MUST NOT allow postings that break copyright laws. Now, as posting how to use ICS without paying for it does NOT break any laws, there is nothing saying that the site admin/mods have to ban this particual discussion. Stealing a service does not equal warez. (note there is no arguement about the legality of USING either, thats not the discussion here.) |
|
|
|