WM 6.5 Kitchen QVGA and VGA Developer Edition - Page 698

jmartin72 · #**6971** (**permalink**) 08-17-2009, 08:58 AM

Does anyone have the link to the ppck developer files? The link was posted a while ago, and I've tried searching for it, but I guess I dont know what it was called. I can't find it anywhere.

**joojoobee666** · #**6972** (**permalink**) 08-17-2009, 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CRACING

Ok got it.

I use spb benchmark. Before converting modules to files ( Untouched SYS ), The overall performance in benchmark report was 265 but the ezinput caused problems so I had convert modules inside IE packages to files and in benchmark report overall performance gone 1 step down thats 264.

And also as I'm using yours source now, in benchmark report overall performance is 263.

So that mean converting modules to files, makes the OS slower.

However, I'm low in these slots, (Re)allocation and etc.

Best Regards

Well, I would say that the performance difference is practically NIL and having more free VM space in Slot 0 would be more important. What good does a slight increase in performance do if the application you want to run does not run due to the VM contraints? (i.e. Slot 0 is to full and therefore only has a few MB's to run apps instead of the approximate 29MB instead if it were to be entireley empty minus some of the XIP stuff). Of course this all mainly applies to the 6.1 kernel as WMReloc and platform rebuilder will fill Slot 1, then 0. But the 6.5 kernel allows them to fill up slot s 1,60,61 then 0. So you have an extra 64MB of module allocation space. Basically with 6.1, we only have 32MB of allocation since we really shouldn't be using 0.

The performance COULD be related to the fact that MORE of the modules have to be dynamically loaded from the flash into ram, as opposed to eXecuting In Place (XIP)?

FCW · #**6973** (**permalink**) 08-17-2009, 09:41 AM

hey guys just wondering if anyone has had this problem. out of the 3 latest 230xx builds i have found that 23024 boots and 23024 and 23028 dont even though im using the 6.5 nk.exe for my device (hermes)

with the 23024 build sms works properly for a change so i havent had to change the redist lang folder but the shell folder needed changing as cabs themes and active sync didnt work. i got these from 23028.
after changing them and getting all that working there was still and issue with the start menu and the gridscene files that i replaced with the files also from 23028.

so after all that all should have been well but now the phone crashes when i use the the toucscreen to scroll down through the start menu. Using the d-pad it works fine.

could this be a bug with the new files? maybe the touch recogniser.dll? any pointers

sendhiloo7 · #**6974** (**permalink**) 08-17-2009, 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by humrod

here you are!

Thanks very much

**joojoobee666** · #**6975** (**permalink**) 08-17-2009, 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pyrorob

hey just curious any way you have or could make something along the lines of a super-reversmode? it be way nice to be able to do both using the send to menu..

Yes, good idea!

CRACING · #**6976** (**permalink**) 08-17-2009, 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joojoobee666

Well, I would say that the performance difference is practically NIL and having more free VM space in Slot 0 would be more important. What good does a slight increase in performance do if the application you want to run does not run due to the VM contraints? (i.e. Slot 0 is to full and therefore only has a few MB's to run apps instead of the approximate 29MB instead if it were to be entireley empty minus some of the XIP stuff). Of course this all mainly applies to the 6.1 kernel as WMReloc and platform rebuilder will fill Slot 1, then 0. But the 6.5 kernel allows them to fill up slot s 1,60,61 then 0. So you have an extra 64MB of module allocation space. Basically with 6.1, we only have 32MB of allocation since we really shouldn't be using 0.

The performance COULD be related to the fact that MORE of the modules have to be dynamically loaded from the flash into ram, as opposed to eXecuting In Place (XIP)?

Yeah your right. A lil difference in benchmark doesn't do much in usage.

Thanks for the detailed infos.

Best Regards

humrod · #**6977** (**permalink**) 08-17-2009, 05:08 PM

I remember a post about to reduce the bars size in the post 23022 sys, but i just can't found it.
If someone remebers where is or close to...
Thanks in advance

**joojoobee666** · #**6978** (**permalink**) 08-17-2009, 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jmartin72

Does anyone have the link to the ppck developer files? The link was posted a while ago, and I've tried searching for it, but I guess I dont know what it was called. I can't find it anywhere.

Yup, here ya go. http://www.ppckitchen.org/Downloads/...s.Unsupported/

qball1616 · #**6979** (**permalink**) 08-17-2009, 08:17 PM

is there a way to take just the "ok" button being in the bottom left corner out of the new 23028 build? I got the build to boot, but couldn't get it to change from the aqua/teal colored 6.1 looking theme, and activsync wouldn't connect. The only real reason I want to upgrade is to have the ok button being moved to the lower left corner

MassStash · #**6980** (**permalink**) 08-17-2009, 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by qball1616

is there a way to take just the "ok" button being in the bottom left corner out of the new 23028 build? I got the build to boot, but couldn't get it to change from the aqua/teal colored 6.1 looking theme, and activsync wouldn't connect. The only real reason I want to upgrade is to have the ok button being moved to the lower left corner

rock someones 23028 the works better perhaps?