This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
Re: WM 6.5 Kitchen QVGA and VGA Developer Edition
23030 ready for visual kitchen. recmoded, gac_ files swapped, magnifier turned off, and button redirects removed
http://www.4shared.com/file/12605396...e9a/23030.html |
|
||||
Re: WM 6.5 Kitchen QVGA and VGA Developer Edition
Quote:
|
|
||||
Re: WM 6.5 Kitchen QVGA and VGA Developer Edition
@Ankit: Some of the settings icons in the Settings>Personal are wrongly configured in current builds, they dont appear in the menu. As you know, these icons are creates using the registry, and there, these builds have a value named Redirect="exe name" which was causing this problem. DomSim has rectified that.
As far as best build is concerned, if you want new UI, i guess 23028 is having the newest UI code in the COM3 branch and is quiet a usable build after applying some tweaks. 23403 although is from the COM4 branch and so its OS code is newer but UI is similar to 23022 so not very good. Wait for more builds to come in this branch. 23601 is not recommended, its OS and UI code both is older. 219xx series is just like before,contains experimental unstable features. As For me, i am still on 23016, the most stable one for me, without any memory leaks, superfast, giving no problem at all Will upgrade when some good builds appear in 2340x series, the COM4 branch i mean.
__________________
ROM: Today its WM 6.5 build 23519
Blog: http://blog.sumitbhardwaj.co.in Thanks to Da_G, Ankit360, joojoobee666 and many other friends for all the WM6.5 goodness i am getting and sharing |
This post has been thanked 2 times. |
|
||||
Re: WM 6.5 Kitchen QVGA and VGA Developer Edition
Quote:
This is my 1st post but I use to read a lot this forum for a long time, real self-explnatory, thanks
__________________
TyTnII - Kaiser
|
|
||||
Re: WM 6.5 Kitchen QVGA and VGA Developer Edition
Has anyone else seen this issue?
Build is 23028 QVGA, Vogue. See attached. Can this be fixed? Thanks!
__________________
|
|
||||
Re: WM 6.5 Kitchen QVGA and VGA Developer Edition
Yeah I figured that.
Didn't know if there was a fix that I missed. Thanks! |
|
|
|