I Benchmarked the Video/Performance of select roms today and found.... - Page 6

**boggsie** · #51 (**permalink**) 07-23-2008, 08:18 AM

Code:

DCD 3.1.1 (5.2.19965)
 
1289 - 1423 - 2556 - 1180 - 0943 = 1478 (99.2%)

Code:

PPCKitchen 5.2.nnnnn (in development ... shhhh)
 
1303 - 1455 - 2541 - 1201 - 0863 = 1472 (98.8%)

Code:

PPCKitchen 5.2.20226
 
1299 - 1417 - 2529 - 1192 - 0871 = 1461 (98.1%)

Code:

JD Hybrid (V.2008, 07-16)
 
1295 - 1372 - 2524 - 1189 - 0870 = 1450 (97.4%)

Code:

theoretical - highest score in each test type for this series
 
1303 - 1455 - 2556 - 1192 - 0943 = 1489 (100%)

Best regards,
-boggsie

**boggsie** · #52 (**permalink**) 07-23-2008, 11:07 AM

Current Daily ROM (at the moment, anyway)

Code:

Bare ROM ... no selections
 
1303 - 1455 - 2541 - 1201 - 0863 = 1472

Code:

Loaded ROM ... my selections
 
1289 - 1417 - 2549 - 1175 - 0866 = 1458

Code:

Loaded ROM ... my selections ... full home setup
 
1266 - 1385 - 2496 - 1157 - 0894 = 1439

	Code:
	my home screen
--==      Elecont Weather        ==--
--==       Today Agenda          ==--
--== Messaging - Exchange Server ==--
--==   Messaging - Windows Live  ==--
--==        RSS Reader           ==--
--==       Device Lock           ==--
--==     Windows Live Search     ==--
--==       WMP Today Plugin      ==--

Best regards,
-boggsie

myn · #53 (**permalink**) 07-25-2008, 10:28 PM

My ultra-fast custom rom that I cooked with the 19588 kitchen scores a 1487

Graphics: 1317
Hardware: 1396
Jpeg: 2668
Games: 1203
Sounds: 852

Total 1487

Here is my selections.txt

http://pastebin.com/f44cc0a90

negamann · #54 (**permalink**) 07-26-2008, 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jethro_static

Is there a difference on installing vsbenchmark on the device and the storage? I put it on the storage and I got 1449

Install location doesn't matter. I got the same score on both device and storage. Does the score decrease after time? because im at an embarrasing 1100. maybe a program is causing this...

EDIT: I reflashed and scored 1438. Bad flash I guess

**Whosdaman** · #55 (**permalink**) 07-26-2008, 03:25 PM

I would like to see how my ROM is doing....I just posted my #5

**Whosdaman** · #56 (**permalink**) 07-29-2008, 11:16 PM

Well I think my ROM has hit a good point could someone please test it, cause I don't have the time atm to do it

please!

**slypher** · #57 (**permalink**) 07-30-2008, 07:36 AM

Great thread, thumbs up OP.

Question, I also did a series of testing for quite a few Roms and found similar results (Sprint OEM had very high stable scores with little variance between tests). I did notice though that the Roms with a higher page pool scored higher. Are all of the Roms that are being tested using the same page pool? I think this should be included in the test results because it seems to make a difference.

Link below for reference:

http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/showthread.php?t=18695

-s

PS: Holy crap, JDs Roms are on Roid Rage..lol!

**rstoyguy** · #58 (**permalink**) 07-30-2008, 07:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slypher

Great thread, thumbs up OP.

Question, I also did a series of testing for quite a few Roms and found similar results (Sprint OEM had very high stable scores with little variance between tests). I did notice though that the Roms with a higher page pool scored higher. Did you notice that as well?

Link below for reference:

http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/showthread.php?t=18695

-s

PS: Holy crap, JDs Roms are on Roid Rage..lol!

I found about the same. I thought I saw that thread before.

I started this one with all the hoopla about updated video drivers. I just wanted to know... But yes, JD strips out all the "slowdown" my rom rom bs.

**boggsie** · #59 (**permalink**) 07-30-2008, 09:03 AM

In the very limited series of evaluations that I ran, I didn't see an appreciable difference between the roms that I used. In this group of roms, the difference from top to bottom was less than 5%.

I was quite surprised, because I had always percieved that JD's roms were much, much faster than anything else out there.

Best regards,
-boggsie

Quote:

Originally Posted by slypher

Great thread, thumbs up OP.

Question, I also did a series of testing for quite a few Roms and found similar results (Sprint OEM had very high stable scores with little variance between tests). I did notice though that the Roms with a higher page pool scored higher. Are all of the Roms that are being tested using the same page pool? I think this should be included in the test results because it seems to make a difference.

Link below for reference:

http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/showthread.php?t=18695

-s

PS: Holy crap, JDs Roms are on Roid Rage..lol!

brunes · #60 (**permalink**) 07-30-2008, 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DHarvey

Wow. I never would have guessed that the ATI drivers would do nothing at all like that. They definitely seem to help UI performance though at least in my opinion.

This is probably because AFICS none of those ROMs even contain the ATI driver... at least their respective ROM pages say nothing about it.

I would like to see a comparison with NFSMan's rom who claims to have the driver. I personally see a noticeable difference in this rom.