I Benchmarked the Video/Performance of select roms today and found....

[jethro_static]

Originally Posted by conflipper

YES finally. i cant even share my score on there internet, says score is not valid.

LOL like I said, It's abnormal. HAHAHA!

[conflipper]

Originally Posted by jethro_static

Hey how about submitting ur results to the site so everybody will be Pwned by the Touch. Whacha say?

I email the help desk asking if they could manually submit my score, i included screenshot of my score. I asked if they could submit it, Lets hope it goes through.

[jethro_static]

Originally Posted by conflipper

I email the help desk asking if they could manually submit my score, i included screenshot of my score. I asked if they could submit it, Lets hope it goes through.

Yeah! Hmmm hope thay don't see the screenies a Phtoshop works coz it's the real results. if they don't accept the results, they must come up with the reason why is the benchmarks results like that.

[EtrnlWolf]

Anyone mind posting a CAB for vsbench on the ppcgeeks ftp? I'm at work and can't "install" the exe as it requires Activesync. Interested to see how my ROM matches up.

[vetvito]

Originally Posted by notrock

so those roms with diamond drivers aren't really doing anything helpful besides looking good as a topic?

I tried to explain this to NFSAN, but those so called Diamond ATI drivers dont do anything for graphics. They are hook drivers, meaning software; in this case they are for the camera and camera only.

For working video drivers you need a capable SPL, highly modified XIP, and then and only then you can think about working the System drivers. Dragging and dropping will get you no where.

[jethro_static]

Look at this. I did not understand anything on the video. Did it prove anything? LOL
http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/0...d-video-drive/

[conflipper]

Originally Posted by jethro_static

LOL like I said, It's abnormal. HAHAHA!

This is the response i got back about my scores.

"Hi,

Effectively, there is a problem reguarding memory allocation in test 3.
Vsbenchmark need 16 Mo of free memory ram to run correctly but some PDA reallocate automatically the memory.
The first two test need less then 6 Mo of free memory ram.
The test 3, the jpeg loading need more then 12 Mo of free memory ram.

Acording to your result, the test 3 is to higher to be correct.
You should see normaly a zooming landscape like this pictures instead of pixelised random colors:

http://vsbench.virtualspaghetti.com/screenshots/005.jpg
http://vsbench.virtualspaghetti.com/screenshots/006.jpg

During the test 1 and 2, the windows mobile OS can reallocate automaticly the free memory space, that's why, test 3 is not running correctly.
This bug will be fixed sooner with new support devices.

Or you can try to reduce more free ram memory.
We received many HTC Touch results, your result should be normaly between 1200 and 1500.

Thanks for your message.
Regards,
Virtual Spaghetti Support.

[jethro_static]

I really don't understand his/her english. and megabytes are reffered to as Mo. I read Mo. as months. LOL I guess they just don't want to be pounded with thousands of emails when a Touch beat something like the xda flame on graphics benchmarks. LOL again.

[rstoyguy]

Originally Posted by jakdillard

thanks for the test info on the rom that I'm running now I got a overall score of 1475

Originally Posted by conflipper

This is the response i got back about my scores.
{cut}...blah...blah...blah...{/cut}
We received many HTC Touch results, your result should be normaly between 1200 and 1500.

Thanks for your message.
Regards,
Virtual Spaghetti Support.

At the top of the charts...I gotta go check out JD's...

[conflipper]

It has to be something great that JD is doing, i did some more test, did fewsoft reset. and I came up with more accurate numbers. The first test i did i got 1507 second test i did i got 1506, third test i did i got 1507 once again. screen shots below has well had pdf file that compile all of the scores for you to ponder over.