|
||||
Re: Horrible Shutter lag
Quote:
Although I couldn't imagine the cost of Canon (or Nikon) teaming up with Sprint and HTC to make a pda phone with serious dslr camera capabilities. I just couldn't see a 1DS Mark IV combined with Touch Pro.......
__________________
Sony CM-Z100SPR, Samsung SPH-A400, Sanyo SCP-8100, Sanyo VI-2300, HTC Mogul, HTC Touch Pro, HTC Hero
Last edited by meanbastard; 11-26-2008 at 02:10 PM. |
|
||||
Re: Horrible Shutter lag
Most of the custom roms on this board have newer versions of the camera software which already have burst and sport modes enabled. Sport helps a lot but still not perfect or what I would consider 'fast'. It does help though so try it.
|
|
||||
Re: Horrible Shutter lag
You know, my friends put up iPhone camera shots on Facebook all the time and they look like crap--especially indoor shots--what a suprise. Something else tends to get overlooked by shutterbugs too--often their poor handling/standing still skills.
If I find a phone with anything other than an above-average camera chances are it's a rare freak of nature, or lacks features I'd much rather have in a trade-off. |
|
||||
Re: Horrible Shutter lag
Quote:
I enabled burst/sport modes on Hibbys1.7 and when using it my camera readily crashed, and I had to reboot to get camera back. When I used JD's rom it didn't work either, but I know he's made some changes since then...just don't know if any of the changes affect the camera. |
|
||||
Re: Horrible Shutter lag
Quote:
Ah, well - we're just talking about crappy cameras Last edited by evilpeople; 11-26-2008 at 03:32 PM. |
|
||||
Re: Horrible Shutter lag
Quote:
|
|
||||
Re: Horrible Shutter lag
Quote:
Try Juggalo's rom, you'll like it. |
|
||||
Re: Horrible Shutter lag
Quote:
Shutters are very archaic, in the fact that they have been around a long long time... and yes photographers still use film, and photographers use SLR cameras,, these cameras have the abillity to set your exposure and light intake and other settings,, thus requiring them to have a shutter........ Cell Phones Do Not,,,,,,,,, Record Players are Archaic,, but as a D.J. I own 2 of them,, that doesnt change the fact that they are archaic.... even though professionals still use turntables instead of cd players and mp3,,, still doesnt change the fact that they are archaic... So I am 100% correct in stating that Shutters are archaic.... even though professionals still use cameras with shutters,, they are still what would be considered archaic.. That doesnt mean they are not still used,, and not still useful... They just have absolutely nothing to do with this thread........... On a cell phone,, and most digital cameras there is no such thing as a shutter.. so the reason for me saying what I did about shutters sir,, is the fact that we need not discuss shutter speed in this thread when discussing the cameras on our phones... The software on these phones tells the capture device what fraction of a second it should capture and encode... the software also tells the ccd how many frames per second to scan,,, so if you break it down,, its like this... if the capture is set to lets say 250 milliseconds,, or 1/4th of a second,, and the device is set to scan at lets say 10 frames per second,,, then the device will intake more light seeing as the ccd will stay active for longer portions throughout the capture... though motion will be more blurry if it moves to say 20 frames per second it is capturing less resident light but will have crisper images,,, if the lighting conditions permit so the length that the software captures an image would be called the shutter speed... the frames per second would be considered the aperature setting. or light intake.. these 2 things are basically the same thing as what are used for shutter and aperature in hardware cameras and could carry over to the photography world easily,, I was simply just trying to clarify to these other folks the proper direction we need to take on this matter... I believe that this camera is not controlled by hardware,,, I believe that it is software controlled,,, but.. and this is a big butt,,, it is not a registry key that controls this.. because the cameras state is always static (meaning changes constantly) so it would have to be a part of the active software controlling capture length and frames per second... so if any gurus out there want to dismantle the camera software and look at the code,, and see if it can be modified,, it would be great.....
__________________
Pay the Cost to Be the Boss,, The Game is to Be Sold not to be Told
Last edited by midiology; 11-30-2008 at 11:16 PM. |
|
|
|