|
||||
Re: The screen surface is not 100% flat
I've seen two Verizon tp2's in person and neither have had ANY dead/stuck pixels. Many that are seeing them in the camera are seeing incorrect feedback from the camera like any phone (it's cmos sensor).
I have also yet to see any useful posts from Exil3d in my reading tonight and would like to state my opinion that he is a troll. I will wrap this up by saying my screen is flat, though there is a slightly inward bevel/dropoff at the top edge of the screen where it meets the upper "edge". I'm sure this is intended. And of course every time you touch the screen it's no longer flat because the screen isn't rigid since it's a touchscreen that requires pressure!
__________________
Hit me up with that giving. Verizon Samsung Fascinate (Galaxy S) Clie -> Clie TG50 -> XV6800 -> Touch Pro2 -> Fascinate |
|
||||
Re: The screen surface is not 100% flat
yeah, my "digitizer" is pretty squishy, really the only thing that pisses me off about the phone. if it had a capacitive screen i would have been in heaven. oh well, i am starting to adapt to the flex.
anyone know of settings that can be altered, specific to the tp2, that will increase sensitivity? i remember adjusting my tp1 and it nearly made it feel like a cap screen. |
|
||||
Re: The screen surface is not 100% flat
Dead pixels and the screen not 100% flat LOL what is going to be next OH WAIT someone count the holes on the back of the sprint one and lets see if we all have the same LOL OCD
|
|
||||
Re: The screen surface is not 100% flat
Quote:
Of course the main benefit is the huge reduction in glare. |
|
||||
Re: The screen surface is not 100% flat
LMAO, damn htc and their craptacular battery covers. I will get an iphone where is doesn't have a battery cover, problem solved.
__________________
"THE HTC EVO LTE..........YES, IT'S A BEAST AND A HALF"
|
|
||||
Re: The screen surface is not 100% flat
Well I was measuring the screen with a micrometer & found that there were several areas that were almost .001, thats right, .001! millimeters higher than other ares of the screen.
Other things I have noticed: -Missing 2 holes on the back battery cover -The LED message indicator is 3 lumens dimmer than the one my wife has (I want the lumens I paid for!) -1/64" of play when I plug my charge cable in (wow HTC, talk about fail!) -The speaker grill on my TP 2 has 2 more holes than my wife's (completely unacceptable) -Side by side my TP 2 has 3 minutes less battery life, even with the 3 lumen deficit. I could go on but I am so agitated right now I can barely speak Exil3d was right & he should never get this phone because it is a POS. Move on to the Iphone.
__________________
Dyeing the Sprint Touch Pro 2 Battery cover:
http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/showthread.php?t=88405 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpKpmFYqyqQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=md_5n8XZWbo Last edited by SolApathy; 09-30-2009 at 11:50 AM. |
|
||||
Re: The screen surface is not 100% flat
Enough of the exil3d bashing. I would say his recent posts are disagreeing with the quality of the TP2... BUT - he is stating the truth and not spreading lies. For the most part, he is correct about HTC's failure to produce consistent quality devices.
Anywho, I would be a bit upset if the screen is too squishy, but as long as it's not worse than running my finger through sand, I should be fine.
__________________
|
|
||||
Re: The screen surface is not 100% flat
It's not the fact that he complains about potential flaws or issues regarding the devices. The problem is that he doesn't leave it at that. He makes it his goal to purposely irritate the users here by making repeated references to what he calls flaws, even in threads that have no relevant connection to the issue he brings up.
Personally I find it amusing. It's something he can't afford & his only joy is attempting to make those that can afford it feel bad. I love my device. Like every device out there that is this complex; it has some minor issues...and I love every one of them! |
|
|
|