|
||||
Re: The price of being uninformed
Something I just thought of.... EBAY!
When most of you people get a steal off ebay, 'cause something was miscategorized, or spelled wrong, or the seller didn't include all the features in the listing you go an brag to your family and friends about how awesome a deal you got! Why didn't you email the seller and tell him? Ok, I'm sure there are a few cases so don't even bother posting them, I believe you. The point is that most arguments in favor of "moral obligation" to enlighten the buyer won't fly... for this particular situation. Peace! I'm not trying to fuel the fire! lol. |
|
||||
Re: The price of being uninformed
Why do we feel the need to assume everyone is a victim? What's next? Should the buyer file suit against him? How about for a couple 100K for all the emotional trauma.
This sounds like a legitimate transaction by every definition. Fact is consumers have a responsibility to be informed. Furthermore you guys are assuming he wasn't informed. Who even knows. So I say congrats on making your sale. And I say congrats to the buyer for getting what he wanted at a fair price. Our free market is absolutely beautiful. Dustin |
|
||||
Re: The price of being uninformed
I dont get why anyone bothers with external recievers when for about another 20% in price you get a full working unit that takes the phone out of the picture.
|
|
||||
Re: The price of being uninformed
yeah maybe you should have told the seller after you had his money that maybe if he's lucky sprint will release an update with gps but you're going to charge him $20 and take the gps back for spending an hour of your day and gas etc to meet with the guy. and then tell him to buy some maps with his other $20 until then so he doesn't get lost!
|
|
||||
Re: The price of being uninformed
Quote:
|
|
||||
Re: The price of being uninformed
There was nothing wrong with the transaction itself the way it was described. There was a willing buyer and a motivated seller and no fraud was involved...the definition of a valid market-price transaction. The seller had no legal duty or moral obligation to inform the buyer that, in the seller's opinion, the buyer may not need the product.
My objection is to the OP coming here to gloat about obviously feeling that he had put one over on the buyer and asking us to join him in laughing at the buyer. And the OP can continue to deny that this was his intent when he originally posted, but those denials are not credible. Last edited by bakntyme; 02-20-2008 at 12:44 PM. |
|
||||
Re: The price of being uninformed
Maybe this person can't put a leaked ROM on their phone because it's a company phone? Maybe they need GPS now for whatever reason and can't wait until Sprint finally releases an update. Let's face it, we're phone nerds...we probably represent .001 percent of the population that has the Mogul....
|
|
||||
Re: The price of being uninformed
Why must this light hearted conversation get beat like a dead dog? Ive made money off people and let other people charge me more cause I knew they needed it. Who cares? Its all about karma. It all works out in the wash....All this speculation I want in too.
Maybe the guy is a millionaire and likes getting a slightly shady deal on craigslist? Don't y'all feel bad now for thinking hes a noob? HAHA
__________________
Went back to a BlackBerry..................
|
|
|
|