8 APR 09 - UPD 25: Mods please lock this thread!

[DigitalAttic]

Originally Posted by scrosler

Greetings!

Off vacation and getting back in the loop now. Sorry if I missed anything important in the thread.

I am about done with my diamond ROM and kitchen. Once that is done I need to figure out how to make them universal. One kitchen two devices, 8 CE os'es.

I have not officially posted 21015 or 21018. Does anyone think they are solid enough for the website? If so I will post them tonight. If not I will just let them be.

As well, I am hunting out new CE OS builds to play with. DJSIVA showed me a nice link with some new stuff so I will play around with that soon. I hope to post something to play with by the end of the upcoming weekend. My apology for no recent updates. The vacation was nice. The blizzard we left and then came back to sucked!

1st off welcome back Scott

I've tested w/a few builds while U were gone, including 21028 using the PPC Kitchen w/ drellisdee's packages. IMHO 21018 is the best of the bunch so far, very responsive, stable. The AS/Exchange "push" problem can be fixed using the cab drellisdee posted in this thread, post#135:

http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/showthread.php?t=57744&page=4

The other minor issue with multi-threaded SMS creation has not been resolved, but doesn't seem to be an show-stopper unless you send an SMS to multiple addresses and expect a separate thread to be created for each person sent to, a multi-party SMS. This is also discussed in post#147/48 in the above thread.

So, I would say a big yes to 21018 and keep an eye out for other builds greater than 21028.

Also, you might want to look into adopting Bepe's new kitchen: seems there's enough new architecture and features to make it worth while, and the modularity of packages I've seen so far may make it easier for you to support both Diamond and Pro on multiple vendors:

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=467488

CFN - DA

[MrTek]

Both the Touch Pro 2 Notification Manager Enhancements and the Menu Enhancements are running on the SSK 1.5 I have installed on my gimped VZW TP.

They might make good defaults for a Rom, or at least included in the SSK folder?

Menu Enhancements (Seems faster than Finger Friendly)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=491457

Notifcation Manager
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=491676

Touch Flo 3D2 is looking promising:

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=486471

FingerKeyboard2 is a nice Keyboard replacement

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=487677

[scrosler]

Originally Posted by MrTek

Both the Touch Pro 2 Notification Manager Enhancements and the Menu Enhancements are running on the SSK 1.5 I have installed on my gimped VZW TP.

They might make good defaults for a Rom, or at least included in the SSK folder?

Menu Enhancements (Seems faster than Finger Friendly)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=491457

Notifcation Manager
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=491676

Touch Flo 3D2 is looking promising:

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=486471

FingerKeyboard2 is a nice Keyboard replacement

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=487677

EXCELLENT INFO!!

[scrosler]

Originally Posted by DigitalAttic

1st off welcome back Scott

I've tested w/a few builds while U were gone, including 21028 using the PPC Kitchen w/ drellisdee's packages. IMHO 21018 is the best of the bunch so far, very responsive, stable. The AS/Exchange "push" problem can be fixed using the cab drellisdee posted in this thread, post#135:

http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/showthread.php?t=57744&page=4

The other minor issue with multi-threaded SMS creation has not been resolved, but doesn't seem to be an show-stopper unless you send an SMS to multiple addresses and expect a separate thread to be created for each person sent to, a multi-party SMS. This is also discussed in post#147/48 in the above thread.

So, I would say a big yes to 21018 and keep an eye out for other builds greater than 21028.

Also, you might want to look into adopting Bepe's new kitchen: seems there's enough new architecture and features to make it worth while, and the modularity of packages I've seen so far may make it easier for you to support both Diamond and Pro on multiple vendors:

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=467488

CFN - DA

Thank you much! I will look into 21018. Which build was the best? The one FPOS put on my FTP server or was there another build on rapid share?

[jucytec]

Originally Posted by scrosler

Thank you much! I will look into 21018. Which build was the best? The one FPOS put on my FTP server or was there another build on rapid share?

21028 is the only one that I can get my hands on...

21032 is supposed even better... 21028 is found in Calu's 21028 Kitchen.

Edit: 21028 > 21018... IMO

[DigitalAttic]

Originally Posted by scrosler

Thank you much! I will look into 21018. Which build was the best? The one FPOS put on my FTP server or was there another build on rapid share?

You can use the one I packaged up for the kitchen from the link over at XDA: Post#920... it needs an NCF35 OEM update, as I didn't catch that it was a slightly older release when I posted it. I have updated my version in the SSK kitchen I use.

PM me if U need any details.

TTFN - DA

[oldman]

Originally Posted by JWhipple

I've seen the same thing, whether it's audio or video in WMP... In landscape mode I get the buttons, but nothing in portrait.

I get the buttons in both Landscape and Portrait with the C2 Kitchen and 931 OS.

Bob

[aldojr80]

We are all glad your back i really mean that i hate that i had to go cold turkey for this long. And 21018 is worth it in my opinion i have found it very stable and fast but whats with this other one your talking about something that will blow our mind.

[kyle4269]

Welcome back Scott! You've been missed, I cant wait to see what you have in store for us!

[gman4471]

Scott, One other thing I noticed is that encryption is missing from the recent builds as well. Is there a chance that this be added back in? Many exchange server setups impose security policies that require this option