|
|
|
||||
|
Re: NAND Boot Testing - 03-24: FRX05 on NAND (Testing new RIL)
crap - same issue with Titanium... need root
this is not good - I may have to dump this install for now... |
|
||||
|
Re: NAND Boot Testing - 03-24: FRX05 on NAND (Testing new RIL)
Quote:
First, the no data on first boot is because of that DNS issue still. That needs to be resolved in a different way. For Titanium, open it, click Problems, then use it to download and install busybox. I'll be able to provide a little better feedback in a little while after I've had a chance to test it out. |
| This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
|
Re: NAND Boot Testing - 03-24: FRX05 on NAND (Testing new RIL)
Nate, I tried that with Titanium... no luck.
I will mention that waking seems to be going better... although I am not sure I have seen a green LED yet for sleep.... Didnt realize the DNS was still a first boot issue... no problem. If the rest of the data connection is stable, i really dont care! |
|
||||
|
Re: NAND Boot Testing - 03-24: FRX05 on NAND (Testing new RIL)
Quote:
I think we are looking at adding su, Superuser.apk, and busybox to the future androidupdates as a permanent addition. |
|
||||
|
Re: NAND Boot Testing - 03-24: FRX05 on NAND (Testing new RIL)
Quote:
I have noticed that power down always hangs, if the phone is plugged in. seems to be rather stable unplugged... |
|
||||
|
Re: NAND Boot Testing - 03-24: FRX05 on NAND (Testing new RIL)
Sleep state update: its the same as posted in my video earlier, although it may take longer to get there...
|
|
||||
|
Re: NAND Boot Testing - 03-24: FRX05 on NAND (Testing new RIL)
Give me a few minutes. I've found a few things that were messed up (latest NBH isn't the latest kernel). I'm putting together a new androidupdate and NBH. Just waiting on a compile, then I'll test, then I'll upload.
|
| This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
|
Re: NAND Boot Testing - 03-24: FRX05 on NAND (Testing new RIL)
Quote:
Glad you guys know what you are doing... all I am good at is complaining about things that dont work...
|
![]() |
|
|
|