|
|
||||
Re: New SERO Oct 1st
Quote:
SERO users get in the mindset that we use this much data and minutes and everything else and they see it as Sprint charging them $30 to use what they currently use. They think their use is not going to change just because they have the EVO. Maybe Sprint did a study and found out that people think they will use the same amount of everything and when that person switched they saw that everything increased. So because of this study they increase the cost and then offer the customer the iconic phones and then add things to their plan. A Win for the customer and a Win for Sprint Big Wigs and Win for the company since they get more money to how build out the future of Sprint. You know - since Sprint doesn't want to let everyone on the Evo and Epic and bring down their network like ATT and the iPhone. Last edited by rushco; 08-26-2010 at 05:37 PM. |
|
||||
Re: New SERO Oct 1st
Quote:
I'm happy about the option. I'm not happy about my bill almost doubling to take advantage of it. That's hard to understand? The Evo fee is a fluff fee. Pure and simple. Sprint needs revenue, in comes a fluff fee. I am ok with paying $10 more, keeping SERO and getting one of the newer phones. What about the other $10 I'll have to pay? ANOTHER fluff fee. One is tolerable. Two is ridiculous, especially when combined they are 2/3 of what I pay total now. |
|
||||
Re: New SERO Oct 1st
Quote:
Then $10 since they probably paid a lot to get the first phone with a front camera. HDMI. Because of these features Sprint will be charging $10. Will they get rid of it? Maybe if they see bad sales. For now it is here to stay. There are always other carriers with no "fluff fee". But I feel like this all has some sort of plan behind it. Has been thought out all the way? We will find out. |
|
||||
Re: New SERO Oct 1st
Quote:
For goodness sakes, you are paying $30 for voice and data. If you don't want to pay the extra $20 to get the Evo, then don't do it. I think people forget that SERO is really a special plan that really doesn't exist anywhere else (other carriers). Last edited by x10guy; 08-26-2010 at 06:10 PM. |
|
||||
Re: New SERO Oct 1st
Quote:
Maybe they should be comparing to what they SHOULD be paying, rather than what they COULD pay, if they wanted to (as you said, no one is forcing them). I'm sure they'd be singing a different tune if Sprint just shuffled people onto EPRP. |
|
||||
Re: New SERO Oct 1st
Quote:
|
This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
|
|