Hard-SPL Unlocker: How do I PAY, AGAIN, so I am NEVER BLOCKED in future after PAYING?

[tt C6]

Originally Posted by QMeli907

maybe they just dont monitor it anymore since newer devices are coming out

Then,
the system should be changed:

In exchange for our payments, we should get a downloadable program that works without future issues.
I do NOT want to rely on a "pass code" to use in the future because then we have to rely on them to maintain their website and communication.

They have not been maintaining either thier communication or their website.

Windows Mobile 6.5 is dead.
The phones that are out there have little value.
I've decided to keep my TP2 on Sprint and run it for as many years as I can.

[PropagandaX]

Probably not at some point they should consider just unlocking the unlocker if they cant support it anymore.....

[matt12eagles]

All you have to do is use a different computer and a diferent internet source. Ive unlocked 3 replacements all activated on the same phone number. Somehow the unlocker checks the computer and internet connection... Yesterday I went to Burger King and used my lil brothers laptop and did the unlock in less then 15 min.

[Eschelon]

Look bud, I understand your frustration, but as a capitalist I'm going to give it to you straight:

They created the product, so that means they also reserve the right to charge you whatever you want, whenever they want, and for however much they want. But as a consumer, you also reserve the right to NOT buy their product. Nobody is holding a gun to your head and forcing you to pay the money. In purchasing the HardSPL, you are paying for a luxury item that most of the public does not own. And if you don't like it, then you also reserve the right to write a HardSPL unlock code yourself and enter the market as their competitor and offer your unlocker for cheaper or even free

Look, fact of the matter is, they created a product and reserve the right to charge you for it. And by no means should they be forced into offering it for free. I know you feel that you already paid for it, but their terms are clear up front that you will need to pay for multiple devices. Arguing that "you already paid for it once and that should be enough" is akin to saying "I paid taco bell for that burrito last week, but I'm hungry again so they should give me free burritos for life since I already paid for that first one..."

Sounds ridiculous, I know, but my point in that analogy is that you are asking to unlock a second (or third, or fourth) device and, per their terms, they can charge you for it.

Again, if you don't like it, then don't buy their product or support them (or, even better, go write your own code and set your own terms)

[Recursion]

Generally, unique MEID unlocked on unique PC (MAC Addy) via unique IP Addy = unlocking love.

But if you are unsuccessful with an unlock, your MEID might be blacklisted...I'm not sure, but I think it's possible based on some of the posts I've read.

I've paid twice when I got a replacement phone, so I know it's frustrating. But next time you're unlocking a phone, make sure it's new, the PC & IP are virgins, and the connection is stable. You should be good to go...

[pimpsuprazx]

Originally Posted by Eschelon

Look bud, I understand your frustration, but as a capitalist I'm going to give it to you straight:

They created the product, so that means they also reserve the right to charge you whatever you want, whenever they want, and for however much they want. But as a consumer, you also reserve the right to NOT buy their product. Nobody is holding a gun to your head and forcing you to pay the money. In purchasing the HardSPL, you are paying for a luxury item that most of the public does not own. And if you don't like it, then you also reserve the right to write a HardSPL unlock code yourself and enter the market as their competitor and offer your unlocker for cheaper or even free

Look, fact of the matter is, they created a product and reserve the right to charge you for it. And by no means should they be forced into offering it for free. I know you feel that you already paid for it, but their terms are clear up front that you will need to pay for multiple devices. Arguing that "you already paid for it once and that should be enough" is akin to saying "I paid taco bell for that burrito last week, but I'm hungry again so they should give me free burritos for life since I already paid for that first one..."

Sounds ridiculous, I know, but my point in that analogy is that you are asking to unlock a second (or third, or fourth) device and, per their terms, they can charge you for it.

Again, if you don't like it, then don't buy their product or support them (or, even better, go write your own code and set your own terms)

I could dig that,but its like a monopoly almost, I $20 every time i unlock the phone, thats fine, but why should we have so many problems every time to HSPL a device when prior devices weren't so problematic, in regard to obtaining and using the HSPL I mean.

[nrfitchett4]

Originally Posted by tt C6

I'm not paying AGAIN for something I ALREADY paid for.

If we e-mailed them with proof of our payment.
we should get a response with a solution.

The system should be changed:
In exchange for our payments, we should get a downloadable program that works without future issues.
I do NOT want to rely on a "pass code" to use in the future because then we have to rely on them to maintain their website.

Windows Mobile 6.5 is dead.
The phones that are out there have little value.
I've decided to keep my TP2 on Sprint and run it for as many years as I can.

if they gave you a program to unlock phones, then you could be selling phones unlocked and profitting off of their software.
Have you tried on a different computer prefereably on a different internet connection????
Maybe you should take this over to the xda forum where it belongs!!!

[Eschelon]

Originally Posted by pimpsuprazx

I could dig that,but its like a monopoly almost, I $20 every time i unlock the phone, thats fine, but why should we have so many problems every time to HSPL a device when prior devices weren't so problematic?

Again, nobody is forcing you to buy their product. If you don't like it, then don't buy it

If you want to luxury of owning it (or for that matter, any other product out there in the marketplace) then you need to pay what the product's creator/inventor charges. If you think it's a monopoly, write parliament in the UK (where cmonex lives) and file a complaint. But from a legal standpoint, cmonex can charge you whatever she wants since she wrote the code. That's how the marketplace works, champ

[pimpsuprazx]

Originally Posted by Eschelon

Again, nobody is forcing you to buy their product. If you don't like it, then don't buy it

If you want to luxury of owning it (or for that matter, any other product out there in the marketplace) then you need to pay what the product's creator/inventor charges. If you think it's a monopoly, write parliament in the UK (where cmonex lives) and file a complaint. But from a legal standpoint, cmonex can charge you whatever she wants since she wrote the code. That's how the marketplace works, champ

like I said before, I could dig that, but I'm probably getting rid of the damn thing anyway so whats the sense of bitching about it? lol

[Wesley762]

Can't we all just be Friends