Quote:
Originally Posted by aman1127
Totally agree however there is no perfect Rom. It isn't possible to name an OS that has no bugs. And most bugs arise because of additional of features. So since Android 1.0 has less bugs then 2.1 and 2.2, can it be called better?
Sent from my fast as hell phone that you can only wish you had
|
i see your point, however, 1.0 is severely lacking in features compared to 2.1/2.2 lol. I wouldn't even consider Android if I couldn't have 2.x. I just want to know if the bugs with 2.2 are bad enough to make many people stay with 2.1... stock 2.2, not custom. One thing I can't stand in major slow down and lag (I left that behind with WinMo), so I'm wondering if it's been exaggerated of if it really is a big enough issue to avoid the update. I know the benefits of 2.2, but if bugs are bad enough I'm willing to give them up for now btw.