dan@sprint.com response I got

[champ052005]

Originally Posted by Mutiny32

Again, you are not leveling the playing field. The Linux TCP/IP stack is much more robust than that of Windows Mobile for one, but the entire OS is a different animal. If you want to argue what will make a page load faster, I suggest you go the Linux/WebKit vs WindowsCE/IE route. I'd agree then.

Hmm....so from what I understand...if we compare a My Touch 3G on t-Mobile and a N1 on t-mobile, you are saying that they should load at the same time? Since they both have the same OS and the Linux TCP/IP stack?

PSlim...you are on T-Mobile...make it happen! lol.

I'm just interested to see what would happen. If Mutiny is right, then I guess I learned something new for the day lol.

I would think that RAM would be a factor too.

[WarChild]

Originally Posted by champ052005

Well I sent him an e-mail that basically said 'you lie'. So I'm waiting for a response. lol, not sure if I will get one but I did receive that automated response saying that his staff will e-mail me back.

So in short, maybe tomorrow. hahah....this is gonna be interesting.

Your gonna have to post that one. I wanna see it.




CW

[Cicatrize]

Originally Posted by champ052005

Hmm....so from what I understand...if we compare a My Touch 3G on t-Mobile and a N1 on t-mobile, you are saying that they should load at the same time? Since they both have the same OS and the Linux TCP/IP stack?

PSlim...you are on T-Mobile...make it happen! lol.

I'm just interested to see what would happen. If Mutiny is right, then I guess I learned something new for the day lol.

I would think that RAM would be a factor too.

Yep, RAM is also a bottleneck for two reasons. First is allocated memory allowed for the browser, second is the bus speed. Mutiny is not right. I would bet money on it. I cannot count how many videos I've seen of different devices loading pages on the same wi-fi connection with very different results. This isn't rocket science, and if Mutiny really "does this for a living", then he should know that.

[gTen]

Originally Posted by Cicatrize

Yep, RAM is also a bottleneck for two reasons. First is allocated memory allowed for the browser, second is the bus speed. Mutiny is not right. I would bet money on it. I cannot count how many videos I've seen of different devices loading pages on the same wi-fi connection with very different results. This isn't rocket science, and if Mutiny really "does this for a living", then he should know that.

Well he was not clear whether or not he does networking for cellphones but maybe rather computer networking dealing with Xeon and Harpletown/Gainstown PCs...where CPU bottleneck is not an issue but configuring tcp/ip stack makes a lot of difference for performance and lowering ping.

Either way I explained above why it is not the case..so lets move on

[Cicatrize]

New thread for this ridiculous discussion of the Evo not being faster than TP2 at loading websites:

http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/showthread.php?t=121583