|
||||
Re: |HERM|6.5|ROM|WWE| ** EnergyROM 3.0 'Phoenix' (21812) ** || Build date 61209 ||
Quote:
__________________
Rooted Sprint EVO 4G 1.32.651.6
Radio: 1.39.00.05.31 OMJ EVO 2.1 Eclair v1.2 "My next move be my best move" |
This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
Re: |HERM|6.5|ROM|WWE| ** EnergyROM 3.0 'Phoenix' (21812) ** || Build date 61209 ||
Here you go! Hope this is what your looking for.
|
This post has been thanked 2 times. |
|
||||
Re: |HERM|6.5|ROM|WWE| ** EnergyROM 3.0 'Phoenix' (21812) ** || Build date 61209 ||
Even with the Tachi dialer I'm still having really erratic dialer behavior. Any ideas?
Edit: And I'm running 60509, can I just upgrade the ROM to the newest version or will it be a completely clean flash? IE, can I keep the messages, address book, etc or when I flash it will I have to restore a backup to get it all back? |
|
||||
Re: |HERM|6.5|ROM|WWE| ** EnergyROM 3.0 'Phoenix' (21812) ** || Build date 61209 ||
Loading the june 13th build, gonna test it out...see how it works out....will see what i like...definitely looks good, have read thru the forums so looks nice
__________________
To learn you must first admit you do not know, to succeed you must try harder even in failure, to become stronger you have to want it
|
|
||||
Re: |HERM|6.5|ROM|WWE| ** EnergyROM 3.0 'Phoenix' (21812) ** || Build date 61209 ||
CMYLXGO's Tach Dialer BlueTooth WorkAround
EnergyROM Edition http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/showpost.p...73&postcount=1 -= Icon only shows if BlueTooth Radio is ON or OFF. It does not indicate if a device is connected =- |
|
||||
Re: |HERM|6.5|ROM|WWE| ** EnergyROM 3.0 'Phoenix' (21812) ** || Build date 61209 ||
Quote:
And their networks are not vastly inferior to CDMA 2000 networks. The difference in frequency is minimal. AT&T uses Band II and Band III, while T-Mobile uses Band IV (AWS) UMTS. II and III operate on the exact SAME PCS spectrum (850 and 1900 mhz), Band IV operates on 1700 uplink (to the handset) 2100 downlink. 200mhz is NOT a significant difference in building penetration, cell distance, etc. The reason for more cell sites with GSM networks is that their 3G solutions are a completely new network overlay, capable of handling voice AND data (and thus why you can make a voice call and data call at the same time. You actually connect to two DIFFERENT networks in UMTS areas), and GSM uses time division instead of code division. The technology is capable of extremely high and extremely consistent call quality (significantly better than CDMAs, in theory), however has a hard wired set of "time slots" that users rotate through. CDMA networks theoretically have NO capacity limit, but as more users utilize certain cell sites with certain backhaul call quality exponentially degrades. Even still, 2.5G GSM's timeslot management systems, with vocoders installed are MORE efficient than CDMA. You can have more users on a GSM network with better call quality than on a CDMA2000 network, in both AT&T and T-Mobile's implentations vs. Sprint and Verizon's. The PRIMARY reason for the 2.5 to 1 cell site figure is that there is more coverage OVERLAP with GSM. Verizon and Sprint tend to have very friendly roaming agreements, which T-Mobile and AT&T do not. Also, THREE national carriers were using GSM (Cingular, AT&T Wireless, T-Mobile) versus the TWO that were using CDMA, and had MUCH more friendly roaming agreements to cut down on costs. It's not an issue of the technology, it's an issue of the AT&T/Cingular merger and more hostile GSM roaming agreements of the past (which have since gotten much friendlier, but there's still a LOT more overlap between carriers and even within carriers due to such mergers). Even if you look at how T-Mobile was formed (Aerial, PowerTel, VoiceStream), those networks had significant overlap, which Verizon and Sprint's formations did NOT. Their networks were more or less built from the ground up or were purchased from operaters in different markets, THEN purchased. Also, WCDMA also allows for MUCH higher theoretical data speeds, is MUCH more spectrum-efficient, etc. CDMA vs GSM always was, and always will be a "6 of one, half a dozen of another" battle. They both have their advantages and disadvantages, and really the differences people notice in the technologies have more to do with carrier implementations than anything else. For instance, people always tout GSM for being advantageous because of SIM cards. The same is possible, and is used on several CDMA networks in the world. They're called RUIM cards, however no US carrier has jumped on them. |
This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
Re: |HERM|6.5|ROM|WWE| ** EnergyROM 3.0 'Phoenix' (21812) ** || Build date 61209 ||
NRZ, thanks for the new rom and the wcm! I missed that app. now my life is perfect!
|
|
||||
Re: |HERM|6.5|ROM|WWE| ** EnergyROM 3.0 'Phoenix' (21812) ** || Build date 61209 ||
CMYLXGO would you mind posting a skin only version of your pure energy dialer? I don't want to write over the installed dialer version but really liked the graphics from the pure energy one.
__________________
|
|
||||
Re: |HERM|6.5|ROM|WWE| ** EnergyROM 3.0 'Phoenix' (21812) ** || Build date 61209 ||
Great Rom once again =D> one thing i noticed is that the standard rom works with my vzw touch pro but then when i try to just download the titanium rom it gets stuck at vzw bootscreen and keeps restarting, so not sure what the difference is in the rom kitchens but atleast standard works for now so im VERY happy
|
|
Tags |
sprint, touch pro |
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/cdma-tp-development/69545-h-july-4-energy-6-5-21916-6-5-x-29022-sense-2019-a.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
[ROM][WWE][1/31/2010] 6.5.3 XIYLRom Mega Version 20 (23518) - Page 2 - xda-developers | This thread | Refback | 10-07-2010 06:10 AM |