CDMA Touch Pro XIPs 20764 20771 20954 21015 21018 21028 21032 21109 - Page 13

**Getitnowmarketing** · #**121** (**permalink**) 02-17-2009, 12:48 AM

I've got drop in ppck sys 20954, 21014, and 21015 with the cores containing the new matching ported xips for those who want the newer builds using ppc kitchen. Thread is here http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/showthread...647#post713647 if anyone is interested. Former palm if you would like the source xip's I ported these from pm me.

FormerPalmOS · #**122** (**permalink**) 02-17-2009, 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drellisdee

I've got drop in ppck sys 20954, 21014, and 21015 with the cores containing the new matching ported xips for those who want the newer builds using ppc kitchen. Thread is here http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/showthread...647#post713647 if anyone is interested. Former palm if you would like the source xip's I ported these from pm me.

Thanks - I found it. XIP 21015 ported, testing now with SYS 21015 (OS has booted - customizations just completed as I type this). BTW the XIP has grown a bit - I had to massage the manifest (.dsm) files a bit to make it fit into my smaller address space. Not much more room for growth - but then again gguruusa warned of this early in the thread so it comes as no surprise.

FormerPalmOS · #**123** (**permalink**) 02-17-2009, 04:15 PM

New XIP for SYS 21015 uploaded. I've tested this - am running with it on my phone as of this morning. Pretty fast - definitely faster than 20954.

**lllboredlll** · #**124** (**permalink**) 02-17-2009, 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FormerPalmOS

I'm getting pretty good at turning them quickly. But 21159 - that's WM6.5. My understanding is that WM6.5 breaks the camera, potentially SMS sending, and who knows what else. When it is stable I'll probably jump on it like a senior on his prom date...

Better wear your condom. Don't want no babies this early in life

FormerPalmOS · #**125** (**permalink**) 02-17-2009, 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lllboredlll

Better wear your condom. Don't want no babies this early in life

Been there - done that - twice. Made medically sure there will be no third. But we digress...

slyfox7 · #**126** (**permalink**) 02-18-2009, 12:58 AM

what would I need to do to use this in scotts vzw rom?

**mikee4fun** · #**127** (**permalink**) 02-18-2009, 01:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FormerPalmOS

New XIP for SYS 21015 uploaded. I've tested this - am running with it on my phone as of this morning. Pretty fast - definitely faster than 20954.

Is this quicker than the 20764?

Thanks in advance!!! And thanks for your hard work. =)

**lllboredlll** · #**128** (**permalink**) 02-18-2009, 01:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slyfox7

what would I need to do to use this in scotts vzw rom?

Scott already uses these XIP's in certian versions

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikee4fun

Is this quicker than the 20764?

Thanks in advance!!! And thanks for your hard work. =)

So far it does to me even with a tiny page pool such as 6mb

roney781 · #**129** (**permalink**) 02-18-2009, 03:06 AM

thank you,thank you.

FormerPalmOS · #**130** (**permalink**) 02-18-2009, 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slyfox7

what would I need to do to use this in scotts vzw rom?

If using one of his cooked ROMs (i.e. you unrar a xxxx.nbh file) it is pretty tough to do. If using his kitchen, you first get the right SYS folder in place, then extract the contents of the XIP into the ROM and SYS folders and cook. It's pretty easy. Let the XIP over-write what's in the kitchen now (it only replaces the .ROM and .VM files in the SYS folder, and the os.nb.payload and boot.rgu in the ROM folder).

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikee4fun

Is this quicker than the 20764?

Thanks in advance!!! And thanks for your hard work. =)

I used 20764 for quite a while and was satisfied with its speed. It was stable. I then used 20954 for a few days and it was definitely laggy compared to 20764. 21015 seems as fast as I remember 20764 being, but with the passage of time and playing with 20954 in between I can't say for sure which one was faster. Most likely, they are the same. Note - I was using 10MB pagepool on all three and a fairly fat ROM. lllboredlll usually runs a stripped ROM and smaller pagepool so that may reveal a speed difference between the two that I couldn't see with my specific build.