|
||||
Re: OMJ's HTC EVO 2.2 Custom ROM v2.0 | FroYo | *Updated | 7/31/10*
cooking now....hope ya'll are happy, I'm giving up my morning ritual playing COD6 killin peeps :P
though the 8mb - 3mb camera is no big deal & as squat showed, there's no big diff in quality.....I think I'll leave out the custom kernel & let ya'll decide if u wants.... eta= 30-45min
__________________
|
This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
Re: OMJ's HTC EVO 2.2 Custom ROM v2.0 | FroYo | *Updated | 7/31/10*
Quote:
|
|
||||
Re: OMJ's HTC EVO 2.2 Custom ROM v2.0 | FroYo | *Updated | 7/31/10*
yeah, now I'm debating to include it or not.....comment quick!!!!!
|
|
||||
Re: OMJ's HTC EVO 2.2 Custom ROM v2.0 | FroYo | *Updated | 7/31/10*
I haven't read much of the custom kernels... would it affect battery life greatly?
__________________
The box said "Requires Windows 95, NT, or better", so I installed Linux
Never be afraid to try something new. Remember, amateurs built the ark, and professionals built the Titanic. |
|
||||
Re: OMJ's HTC EVO 2.2 Custom ROM v2.0 | FroYo | *Updated | 7/31/10*
how much of a PITA would it be to cook two versions? one with, one without?
|
|
||||
Re: OMJ's HTC EVO 2.2 Custom ROM v2.0 | FroYo | *Updated | 7/31/10*
since is not really hard to flash why you cook with out and just post the link to get it in case that some one wanted
|
|
||||
Re: OMJ's HTC EVO 2.2 Custom ROM v2.0 | FroYo | *Updated | 7/31/10*
not that big of a deal.....I'll cook 2, we'll see which one is preferred....but really, most ppl root to have wifi tether, the only way you're gonna get it is with a custom kernel!
Last edited by OMJ; 08-03-2010 at 08:46 AM. |
This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/cdma-htc-evo-4g-development/123534-final-omjs-htc-evo-2-2-custom-rom-v4-6-froyo-3-70-651-1-updated-3-29-11-a.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
[ROM]OMJ's HTC EVO 2.2 Custom ROM v3.5 | FroYo 3.29.651.5 | *Updated 9/25/10* - Page 39 - xda-developers | This thread | Refback | 10-09-2010 03:18 PM |