This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
Re: 9-29 | rom | wm 6.5 | Rhodium 2.1 || GadgetROM v1.3 || 23017
I've noticed the Programs tab has the 4 row and they seem too big to fit in the screen.
Also, after using Wm 6.5.1, I really prefer the X to be down low and NOT in the upper right. Otherwise, this is the most beautiful ROM I've used in a looong time. Nice work. |
|
||||
Re: 9-29 | rom | wm 6.5 | Rhodium 2.1 || GadgetROM v1.3 || 23017
I noticed that the 4 program across layout is slightly lower but I much prefer it to have the additional programs listed. The slider bumps into to it a little but I also noticed this with the 3 across layout so this is common from what I can see.
|
|
||||
Re: 9-29 | rom | wm 6.5 | Rhodium 2.1 || GadgetROM v1.3 || 23017
Quote:
things I would like to see are a clean rom added to the series so we can add our own programs(for those of us that don't use footprints, fmradio, spb screenshot, different jbeds, etc) and . maybe swapping out the Opera for the latest 9.7 build on xda. But I'm cool using this one so either way. Last edited by Riley; 09-30-2009 at 03:30 PM. |
This post has been thanked 2 times. |
|
||||
Re: 9-29 | rom | wm 6.5 | Rhodium 2.1 || GadgetROM v1.3 || 23017
I'm currently playing with 21859. Once I make sure that the drag & drop start menu works, I'll do a clean version without some of the add ins.
__________________
WM 6.5 Taskbars | GadgetROM for Touch Diamond Donations are always strictly voluntary and completely appreciated. Thank you! |
This post has been thanked 4 times. |
|
||||
Re: 9-29 | rom | wm 6.5 | Rhodium 2.1 || GadgetROM v1.3 || 23017
awesome. thanks alot Gadget. I haven't tried 21859 yet, would like to know your thoughts on it and if its better.
|
This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
Re: 9-29 | rom | wm 6.5 | Rhodium 2.1 || GadgetROM v1.3 || 23017
Just flashed this from Groove5. It will take a little getting back to manila but very nice ROM. The theme is great!!
__________________
Life is Good!!
I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work. |
|
|
|