|
|
|
||||
|
Re: [TESTING] - NAND OMGB (1.2.3)
I never really had any issues with battery life and usually lasts the whole day (but then again I am not a massive data user (twitter, facebook and gmail and some app updates) and I have wifi on pretty much the whole day and only a few calls/texts and less than 30 minutes of GPS)
However I noticed something interesting after installing the battery icon mod from UOT kitchen (By itself it is great instead of the useless icons that come stock). Normally the battery meter is useless and would jump 20-30% randomly and vary from 20% to 90% irrespective of what the actual battery was. But after the battery icon mod now the battery is very stable and has gone down from 95% to 40% in a very linear way without randomly jumping around. I am sure it has nothing to do with the mod as it only mods the framework-res and systemUI apks and doesnt touch the drivers. Is there some type of log I can pull to see how the battery is affected Last edited by htrakr; 02-27-2012 at 03:10 PM. Reason: typo |
|
||||
|
Re: [TESTING] - NAND OMGB (1.2.3)
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Re: [TESTING] - NAND OMGB (1.2.3)
I just followed the instructions in the XDA thread
[KITCHEN][01/22] UOT Kitchen (Ultimate Online Theme Kitchen) version 4.0 - xda-developers |
|
||||
|
Re: [TESTING] - NAND OMGB (1.2.3)
im skeptical because sometimes my battery meter works linearly and sometimes it jumps around. but usually it seems to report about +/- 30% of what it actually is. its pretty bad, but thats a minor problem. the fact that the phone uses up the battery 3-5x faster when idle then in winmo6 is unbearable.
|
|
||||
|
Re: [TESTING] - NAND OMGB (1.2.3)
Quote:
I doubt Android will EVER match WinMo for battery life. Even if we could get it so the drain was identical in airplane mode with NO apps installed/syncing... I seriously doubt if you turned on sync and all that other crap Android would have a chance of lasting as long as WinMo does. The simple fact is Android does a lot more - in the background or otherwise, so it's naturally going to drain more. |
|
||||
|
Re: [TESTING] - NAND OMGB (1.2.3)
Quote:
This still makes me wonder what was so special about that particular day and a half... I haven't ever replicated a run that long, but I have gone 24+ hours at times. Typical seems to be 14-16 hours, but lately it's closer to 10-12. Forcing regular "calibrations" appears to help temporarily, but things always degrade within 3-5 days, and it "seems" to be tied to how often I connect a charger (more connections = faster decline of apparent battery life). |
|
||||
|
Re: [TESTING] - NAND OMGB (1.2.3)
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by arrrghhh; 02-28-2012 at 11:09 AM. |
|
||||
|
Re: [TESTING] - NAND OMGB (1.2.3)
Quote:
__________________
|
| This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
|
Re: [TESTING] - NAND OMGB (1.2.3)
Quote:
Assuming I got the right one, it seems like none of the kernel messages are being printed other than the "Initialized" one, so it's hard to see what (if anything) might be getting determined/set up. Even more against my better judgment... I'm going to ask if there is a "dummy's" guide to getting up and running with a dev system. I'm on Windows (XP), but should be able to set up a dev environment in a virtual PC if it "must" be done under linux. I guess four hours of sleep a day is simply too much. |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|