Oh No! Is anyone with 3D going to Samsung S II ???

[Riley]

Originally Posted by orangekid

This thread deserves its own front page article.

Reading this thread makes me want to go back to a tube tv circa 1990. oh wait, I do have a tube tv. scratch that. lol.

[BlackDynamite]

I'm going to bow out of this. I will summarize gTen's style here with a series of quotes.
First. here is what sparked it all:

Originally Posted by gTen

3D is cool in theaters..but even on TVs its so and so and on a smartphone its a meh...There is a reason why TV sales are down...cause the majority don't care for 3D much...aka its one of those features that wouldn't hurt but not a deal breaker for most. and for 25$ you can make any screen 3d and better then the parralex barrier used on the Evo3d too...

Seriously, it's such a ridiculous claim to say that tv sales are down because people don't care about 3D. Hello, global economic recession? 3D tv sales are actually up by the way. But on top of that, he clearly said "and for 25$ you can make any screen 3d" which is also a ridiculous statement.

When I called him on this:

Originally Posted by BlackDynamite

And there is no way you can spend $25 and convert a 55 inch tv into a 3D tv.

He said:

Originally Posted by gTen

not for 25$...but it can be done..

He then argued this point for 4 or 5 pages, and then "proved" his point by saying:

Originally Posted by gTen

They dont come in those large sizes..yet...

DigInfo TV - Pic3D Film Makes Any LCD Display 3D

So basically, he didn't know what he was talking about from the start, and still argued it for 4 or 5 pages. And then he acted like he somehow won the argument by proving himself wrong in the end.

I am done with it. But I had to post the summary to explain to everyone what they missed when they certainly skip over the last several pages.

[gTen]

Originally Posted by BlackDynamite

I'm going to bow out of this. I will summarize gTen's style here with a series of quotes.

That is very nice of you to summarize it but take into account that a summary is usually done by a neutral 3rd party...effectively your trying to summarize on how I am wrong and you were never ever wrong...

First. here is what sparked it all:

Seriously, it's such a ridiculous claim to say that tv sales are down because people don't care about 3D. Hello, global economic recession? 3D tv sales are actually up by the way. But on top of that, he clearly said "and for 25$ you can make any screen 3d" which is also a ridiculous statement.

Well when 3d tvs never existed..then obviously sales would be up of 3d tvs...even if 1 sold and there were 0 before..that would be called sales going up..I am not saying they aren't selling but fact of the matter is 3d tvs are not influencing the majority of people to buy tvs..and I am not the only one who feels that:

http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/...ales-hollywood

As for 25$ I clearly said 25$ for cellphones....but in principle any screen can be turned to 3d using the same method...

When I called him on this:

He said:


He then argued this point for 4 or 5 pages, and then "proved" his point by saying:


So basically, he didn't know what he was talking about from the start, and still argued it for 4 or 5 pages. And then he acted like he somehow won the argument by proving himself wrong in the end.

um..translation please?

I am done with it. But I had to post the summary to explain to everyone what they missed when they certainly skip over the last several pages.

you summarized nothing...you took 2 quotes out of context and changed them completely and claimed you were right simply because this article was published..just because something is published should not make you turn a 180...

This is equivalent to playing politics when politicians go on TV and start saying random things on how the other guy is wrong without providing any detail.

[orangekid]

Originally Posted by gTen

you summarized nothing...you took 2 quotes out of context and changed them completely and claimed you were right simply because this article was published..just because something is published should not make you turn a 180...

This is equivalent to playing politics when politicians go on TV and start saying random things on how the other guy is wrong without providing any detail.

The battle has intensified with a straw man accusation!

[austin420]

refudiation!

[BlackDynamite]

I'm going to bow out of this. I will summarize gTen's style here with a series of quotes.
First. here is what sparked it all:

Originally Posted by gTen

3D is cool in theaters..but even on TVs its so and so and on a smartphone its a meh...There is a reason why TV sales are down...cause the majority don't care for 3D much...aka its one of those features that wouldn't hurt but not a deal breaker for most. and for 25$ you can make any screen 3d and better then the parralex barrier used on the Evo3d too...

Seriously, it's such a ridiculous claim to say that tv sales are down because people don't care about 3D. Hello, global economic recession? 3D tv sales are actually up by the way. But on top of that, he clearly said "and for 25$ you can make any screen 3d" which is also a ridiculous statement.

When I called him on this:

Originally Posted by BlackDynamite

And there is no way you can spend $25 and convert a 55 inch tv into a 3D tv.

He said:

Originally Posted by gTen

not for 25$...but it can be done..

He then argued this point for 4 or 5 pages, and then "proved" his point by saying:

Originally Posted by gTen

They dont come in those large sizes..yet...

DigInfo TV - Pic3D Film Makes Any LCD Display 3D

So basically, he didn't know what he was talking about from the start, and still argued it for 4 or 5 pages. And then he acted like he somehow won the argument by proving himself wrong in the end.

I am done with it. But I had to post the summary to explain to everyone what they missed when they certainly skip over the last several pages.

By the way, I made sure I had the links to the original posts in all of my quotes. If anyone believes the ridiculous claim that I changed any quotes or took them out of context, just click the links and read the original for yourself.

[gTen]

Originally Posted by BlackDynamite

I'm going to bow out of this. I will summarize gTen's style here with a series of quotes.
First. here is what sparked it all:

Again..a summary has to be done by a neutral 3d party..not someone who is conveniently leaving out 99% of the details they don't like..

Seriously, it's such a ridiculous claim to say that tv sales are down because people don't care about 3D. Hello, global economic recession? 3D tv sales are actually up by the way. But on top of that, he clearly said "and for 25$ you can make any screen 3d" which is also a ridiculous statement.

I answered this in post above...

When I called him on this:

He said:

He then argued this point for 4 or 5 pages, and then "proved" his point by saying:

So basically, he didn't know what he was talking about from the start, and still argued it for 4 or 5 pages. And then he acted like he somehow won the argument by proving himself wrong in the end.

Again..this is an example where you are cherry picking things out of context....

"aka its one of those features that wouldn't hurt but not a deal breaker for most.<-(Notice the period) and for 25$ you can make any screen 3d and better then the parralex barrier used on the Evo3d too..."

aka those 2 sentences are on different topics. The 2nd sentence specifically mentions Evo 3d and parralex barrier...That is why I put a PERIOD there...Though usually I put a line break as well but I guess that didn't happen...

And notice all the other sentences have "..." hence continuing of same thought...

I am done with it. But I had to post the summary to explain to everyone what they missed when they certainly skip over the last several pages.

By the way, I made sure I had the links to the original posts in all of my quotes. If anyone believes the ridiculous claim that I changed any quotes or took them out of context, just click the links and read the original for yourself.

Again a you only summarized 1 out of the 10 topics we discussed..and not only that you summarized your own misunderstanding of what I said...

(watch this orangekid >.> lol)


I suggest that everyone who is interested to go back and read the whole thing of what BlackDynamite DOES NOT WANT YOU TO KNOW..hence him giving his so called "summaries" >.> *whistle*

[BlackDynamite]

I'm going to bow out of this. I will summarize gTen's style here with a series of quotes.
First. here is what sparked it all:

Originally Posted by gTen

3D is cool in theaters..but even on TVs its so and so and on a smartphone its a meh...There is a reason why TV sales are down...cause the majority don't care for 3D much...aka its one of those features that wouldn't hurt but not a deal breaker for most. and for 25$ you can make any screen 3d and better then the parralex barrier used on the Evo3d too...

Seriously, it's such a ridiculous claim to say that tv sales are down because people don't care about 3D. Hello, global economic recession? 3D tv sales are actually up by the way. But on top of that, he clearly said "and for 25$ you can make any screen 3d" which is also a ridiculous statement.

When I called him on this:

Originally Posted by BlackDynamite

And there is no way you can spend $25 and convert a 55 inch tv into a 3D tv.

He said:

Originally Posted by gTen

not for 25$...but it can be done..

He then argued this point for 4 or 5 pages, and then "proved" his point by saying:

Originally Posted by gTen

They dont come in those large sizes..yet...

DigInfo TV - Pic3D Film Makes Any LCD Display 3D

So basically, he didn't know what he was talking about from the start, and still argued it for 4 or 5 pages. And then he acted like he somehow won the argument by proving himself wrong in the end.

I am done with it. But I had to post the summary to explain to everyone what they missed when they certainly skip over the last several pages.

By the way, I made sure I had the links to the original posts in all of my quotes. If anyone believes the ridiculous claim that I changed any quotes or took them out of context, just click the links and read the original for yourself.

[gTen]

BlackDynamite, now your just spamming...

[Mswezey]

I like my Evo 3D.

With or without the 3D I'd still pick it over the Samsung, just because.

But I'll admit both phones are kickass.