in responce to the driver problem we have - Page 9

toviaheli · #81 (**permalink**) 01-25-2008, 02:13 PM

wow, dudes, this is an open forum on the internet that the whole world and his wife and see. any chance we can go back to topic?

Be blessed my friends!

-TOV

htcphone · #82 (**permalink**) 01-25-2008, 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by klurf8881

100000000% agree and what i said too.

i REALLY dont understand so far theres been a few "haters" in this thread who are just really negative. But in the end they say they wouldnt mind having the drivers? OK....then back off and let the people who want to try and make a change do so!!

As weve stated if you dont like the thread DONT POST easy as that. If you dont think anything should be done WHY POST? Let people try stuff thats their choice to do so. Who are you to sit here and say its wrong or stupid to try?

Please do make your own thread n call it "haters of the touch driver idea" and admire the size of eachothers Touch "units"........ cough cough. We dont need the pissing match here whose right or wrong when people are trying to HELP EVERYONE INVOLVED. Its not that hard a concept all consumers benefit off this endeavor.

Yes, there are alot of negative a holes in here. Beware.. they might be HTC or Sprint lapdogs. trying to get us to agree with them....... sad individuals.

eehrhard · #83 (**permalink**) 01-25-2008, 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htcphone

Yes, there are alot of negative a holes in here. Beware.. they might be HTC or Sprint lapdogs. trying to get us to agree with them....... sad individuals.

Or maybe... oh nevermind... This is just silly. I hope that HTC responds. If they dont I hope you guys stick to your laurels and never purchase another HTC product again. Good luck and Godspeed.

htcphone · #84 (**permalink**) 01-25-2008, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eehrhard

Or maybe... oh nevermind... This is just silly. I hope that HTC responds. If they dont I hope you guys stick to your laurels and never purchase another HTC product again. Good luck and Godspeed.

Good, at least we managed to filter one lapdog out this forum.

eehrhard · #85 (**permalink**) 01-25-2008, 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htcphone

Good, at least we managed to filter one lapdog out this forum.

YOU managed to do nothing but look foolish by calling names and beating a dead horse.

Donatom3 · #86 (**permalink**) 01-25-2008, 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htcphone

Good, at least we managed to filter one lapdog out this forum.

Why'd you have to do that? You seriously trying to provoke him into more. Eerhard isn't a lap dog if you actually read all his posts you would see quite the opposite. He's just not agreeing with how pissed off everyone is getting that's all.

htcphone · #87 (**permalink**) 01-25-2008, 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donatom3

Why'd you have to do that? You seriously trying to provoke him into more. Eerhard isn't a lap dog if you actually read all his posts you would see quite the opposite. He's just not agreeing with how pissed off everyone is getting that's all.

I agree.... sorry eerhard. I take it back. Donatom.. your right. But what needs to happen is to keep negative aholes away from this thread. If you dont agree with what is being said here... just don't spew you negativity and move along. Simple.

htcphone · #88 (**permalink**) 01-25-2008, 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by klurf8881

no thats not what i said. what i did say was that theres no point to be negative in here at allin any way- THATS no helping any cause. If the people in question dont like what were doing, feel free to post elsewhere and let the people here try. whats the worst that happens over trying? nothing. the best? we get a fix. nothing to lose.

My point was some people jsut like to be negative a mess with people for no reason and its really sad we cant have a discussion without ever 3 posts someone saying how dumb our idea is or how nothing was ever promised to us. thats GREAT take it elsewhere- thats YOUR opinion not the collective's. Obviously a large group think there is a problem so let them try and do something about it and stay out of it if they have nothing positive to contribute

and on that note you have clearly fit in that category too in another sense on meaninglessly bashing someone, no better than them.

I know... just you have to fight fire with fire. But we must get back on track on this topic. Fighting wont help. One thing I have thought about is how HTC is saying that Ati Imageon is not even on the chip. So what they sell us?

eehrhard · #89 (**permalink**) 01-25-2008, 03:03 PM

I was never trying to offend anyone. I dont think i was being a troll. I wasnt even trying to get you guys to not be upset. If you read my posts it think you will agree. There are trolls and griefers out there that just want to get a rise out of people but that is not and never was my intent. Obviously everyone has their opinions and things that they care about and that is what its all about. Hell if any of you think it will help send me the email that you are sending HTC I will put my name on the bottom of it and send it as well.

GOOD NIGHT NOW!

Donatom3 · #90 (**permalink**) 01-25-2008, 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htcphone

I know... just you have to fight fire with fire. But we must get back on track on this topic. Fighting wont help. One thing I have thought about is how HTC is saying that Ati Imageon is not even on the chip. So what they sell us?

ATI Imageon was never on the chip. If you read all of Qualcomm's documents you see that Qualcomm licensed ATI Imageon Technologies to integrate into their chip. So it's all qualcomm parts with ATI technology implemented into the chip. One of the earlier pages in this thread I posted links to Qualcomm's own documents showing this.