Quote:
Originally Posted by blue4shizzle
my thing is, the ONLY reason why it takes so long to charge while connected to the usb, is because the screen is on.. and what is the biggest thing that causes our battery to drain?? <ding ding> the lcd screen.. so obviously the reason it takes longer to charge is simply because you have that lcd screen on during the process. there is no such thing as proper way to "top off" a batter, or technique of charging it. i dont think some of us are looking at this from a very logical/scientific standpoint. of course we all would like to improve our battery life.. but thinking of wild ways to charge it wont really change a thing. face it, we have a 1350 mah battery.. that is its limit. you wont be able to get a magical extra boost from it just from the way you charge it. it will depend on usage, settings, and what rom you are using. but the idea of charging it from a usb instead of a wall charger is definately not going to make a difference.
|
The reason it takes so much longer to charge over USB is because USB ports on computers put out, at best, a third of the amount of power a wall charge outputs. This is well-known. I don't have the exact figures, but the USB ports barely put out more power than this phone USES, especially when it's actively in use. It's nearly a wash. Wall chargers and high-output car chargers do a much, much better job. So the difference here is that it's getting a slow charge which supposedly conditions the batteries better. I can't confirm if it's true, but this isn't the first time I've heard it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by blue4shizzle
honestly.. if you took a AA energizer battery.. and you used the thing all the way till it was dead.. then you charged it back up to 100 percent- do you honestly think its going to perform any "better" than it did the first time? batteries have limits.. even though that was a harsh example, im just saying. from my experience.. ive done every trick in the book, from different batteries, to charging it while it was turned completely off, to even trying different branded chargers.. there was no change in performance whatsoever. my point is that we have to understand that what you see is what you get.
|
They have limits, but keep in mind they're made up internally of chemicals, chambers, crystals, etc. These all are affected by all sorts of things including temperature, degradation, etc. The manufacturing process leaves certain traces of chemical build-ups that can have effects on the battery's life. It's not absurd to think that SOMETHING could break down these chemicals and allow the cells to store a bit more energy. Not saying it would be a drastic difference, but it's not impossible. These don't work like gas tanks which have absolute capacities. These are a little more complex. All I'm saying is when the manufacturer of the battery/device tells us that deep-cycling it the first few times improves it, I'm more likely to believe them than my own limited knowledge, or that people on a message board without chemistry or engineering experience. None of us here is an expert. So when we get info from the closest thing we have access to, we don't have a good reason to ignore it.