Raphael = HTC Touch Pro

[mdcnman6]

both phones are hot....i just have to figure witch one to get...

[Young_breedent]

Originally Posted by mdcnman6

both phones are hot....i just have to figure witch one to get...

it's actually kinda simple if u want a smaller phone with no keyboard with 4gb of internal memory then go with the htc diamond

but if u love a keyboard and being able to expand your memory with a micro sd card (up to 32gb) and want more ram then go with the htc touch pro

i also believe that the diamond won't have a flash for the camera but the touch pro will

but other than that the phone are identical i might go with the touch pro and get the diamond for my girlfriend (you know they are a girls best friend lol)

[Melobrokeit]

Originally Posted by RobNyc

wow looks super hot
i noticed the samsung glyde for verizon looks cool, maybe what the samsung instinct should of been instead of just touch but hey guess the touch is the new technology

The Glyde looks cool, but its not WM. If it was, I honestly believe i would have finally gone Verizon.

[ayinde6]

No question this will be my next phone!!

[armus]

yeah i'm kinda sold already, even if i have to switch to yucky sprint .1 inches thicker than the touch - no problem, .3 inches narrower than the touch - cool especially with the same size screen and - vga! wifi, gps, motion sensor (these can be good and bad). I might actually like having a keyboard

[neodorian]

Originally Posted by armus

yeah i'm kinda sold already, even if i have to switch to yucky sprint

What? You don't like the idea of having the fastest data in the US for $15/mo? People like to rag on Sprint due to public perception but since all of the carriers pretty much piss me off in some way, I go with the one that has most bang for the buck.

[TurboFool]

[QUOTE=Young_breedent;304827]

Originally Posted by TurboFool

Thats actually half way true the T-mobile version they unveiled was the Htc Diamond not the Htc Touch Pro and thats why it only had 256mb of ram and not 288mb....and I know they showed specs for the "T-Mobile MDA Vario IV" as they call it.....but i believe they just copied the specs from the diamond and just added the camera and keyboard info, because even on the htc website it says 256mb for the touch diamond and 288mb for the touch pro and they are who manufacture the phone so im pretty sure they know there stuff....and as far as the camera goes, they take that off of the US versions because it's for video calling and we all know that no carrier in the US supports that feature as of right now so thats makes the front camera useless

The MDA Vario IV was what I was referring to, not the Diamond. The Diamond has 192MB of RAM, not 256, so they were clearly NOT copying its specs when they revealed it has 256MB. As for the camera, that's my point. They remove that for the carriers that don't support it, which means they ARE willing to make notable hardware changes for the carrier. Carriers have made similar requests for changes in the past. I'm just saying it's feasible for that to happen here, especially with how much will have to change internally for this to go to CDMA.

[otacon72]

"The HTC Touch Pro will be available to customers across all major European, Asian and the Middle Eastern markets in late summer. North American and Latin American versions of the Touch Pro will be available later in 2008, the company detailed"

....am guessing Q1 2009

[poorlyduck]

This phone is so sexy that I wanna make love to it lol, it definitely and without a doubt my next phone, I hear some people complaining in how thick the phone it is, IMO I dont see it thick, dont expect to get a razr out of PDA with sliding keyboard, come one people lol.
I made the actual size in photoshop and it looks great, check it out.

[holo]

Originally Posted by poorlyduck

This phone is so sexy that I wanna make love to it lol, it definitely and without a doubt my next phone, I hear some people complaining in how thick the phone it is, IMO I dont see it thick, dont expect to get a razr out of PDA with sliding keyboard, come one people lol.
I made the actual size in photoshop and it looks great, check it out.

You can't expect that to show up as an actual size on people's screens as everyone will view that a slightly different size depending on their screen resolution and monitor size...