View Single Post
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 05:28 PM
TurboFool's Avatar
TurboFool
Timeless
Offline
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,642
Reputation: 1112
TurboFool is halfway to VIP status based on repTurboFool is halfway to VIP status based on repTurboFool is halfway to VIP status based on repTurboFool is halfway to VIP status based on repTurboFool is halfway to VIP status based on repTurboFool is halfway to VIP status based on repTurboFool is halfway to VIP status based on repTurboFool is halfway to VIP status based on repTurboFool is halfway to VIP status based on rep
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to TurboFool Send a message via MSN to TurboFool Send a message via Yahoo to TurboFool
Re: Raphael = HTC Touch Pro

[QUOTE=Young_breedent;304827]
Quote:
Originally Posted by TurboFool View Post

Thats actually half way true the T-mobile version they unveiled was the Htc Diamond not the Htc Touch Pro and thats why it only had 256mb of ram and not 288mb....and I know they showed specs for the "T-Mobile MDA Vario IV" as they call it.....but i believe they just copied the specs from the diamond and just added the camera and keyboard info, because even on the htc website it says 256mb for the touch diamond and 288mb for the touch pro and they are who manufacture the phone so im pretty sure they know there stuff....and as far as the camera goes, they take that off of the US versions because it's for video calling and we all know that no carrier in the US supports that feature as of right now so thats makes the front camera useless
The MDA Vario IV was what I was referring to, not the Diamond. The Diamond has 192MB of RAM, not 256, so they were clearly NOT copying its specs when they revealed it has 256MB. As for the camera, that's my point. They remove that for the carriers that don't support it, which means they ARE willing to make notable hardware changes for the carrier. Carriers have made similar requests for changes in the past. I'm just saying it's feasible for that to happen here, especially with how much will have to change internally for this to go to CDMA.
Reply With Quote