|
||||
Re: HTC Pro 2 vs. Telus HSPA
Quote:
Your above statement does not make any sense either; how can a phone utilize a 4G network if it weren't a 4G phone? A necessary condition for utilizing a 4G network would be a 4G-capable phone. |
|
||||
Re: HTC Pro 2 vs. Telus HSPA
Again, 4G = LTE, this IS NOT an LTE phone, nor is any phone currently available in America. Therefore, it will not work on a 4G network.
|
|
||||
Re: HTC Pro 2 vs. Telus HSPA
Ok, first of all, I am not here to get ganged up on, second, I already know the network Telus is on, is a 3G network! Oh, and just you all know 4G DOES NOT = LTE. The LTE network is a completely new network, the GSM network that Telus and Bell are switching to in the new year IS the 4G, thats why it is going to be the principle network until the LTE (Long Term Evolution) network is up and running, its the pre-cursor to the network. So, YES, the TP2 will work on the 4G network, and so will the HTC Snap (Cedar)!
__________________
An avid PPCGeeker, that will help to the best of my ability!
|
|
||||
Re: HTC Pro 2 vs. Telus HSPA
Quote:
|
|
||||
Re: HTC Pro 2 vs. Telus HSPA
Quote:
Noone is ganging up on you, you seemed to be misinformed thats all. |
|
||||
Re: HTC Pro 2 vs. Telus HSPA
Technically, that's right, but only because there are other, non-LTE technologies in the common definition of 4G, specifically WiMax.
The problem is that 3G, in the "GSM" world, relateds to the UMTS standard -- a standard for a network that few operators actually run. (In the "CDMA" world, 3G usually means EVDO.) What AT&T runs and what Telus is deploying is an HSPA network. The various HSDPA, HSUPA, HSPA, and HSPA+ standards fall into what is commonly called 3.5G. Much of this is marketing speak and thus drives the really technical folks a bit nuts. Both LTE and WiMax fall into the 4G classification. ClearWire (combined with Sprint's resources) operates a WiMax network in several U.S. cities with a bunch more supposedly coming up later this calendar year. Verizon just did a Boston-Seattle call in LTE, but isn't taking customers for this network yet. Essentially, that's it for 4G here in the States in mid-2009. More info on the marketing/technical intersection of the "G's" can be found at 2G, 3G, 3.5G, 4G, 5G, 6G…cleaning the mobile telco standards mess. While I'm not thrilled with all of the definitions in the article and the info there is two and a half years out of date, it's not a not a bad review. |
|
||||
Re: HTC Pro 2 vs. Telus HSPA
As a person who works in the industry, let me clear some things up.
The HTC Touch Pro2 will absolutely NOT work on the TELUS/Bell HSPA network. It works on completely different frequencies (2100mhz, 900mhz) The TELUS/Bell network will be 1900/850, exactly the same as Rogers. As a previous person said, 3.5G network is just a buzz word. HSPA is capable of up to a 14Mpbs down-link which is what TELUS/Bell will have. Rogers is moving towards an HSPA plus network in 2010 with speeds of a 21Mbps down-link. The fourth generation LTE network will first be launched by TELUS/Bell in 2012ish in Canada. As for the special guy who keeps saying the new network from TELUS/Bell is a 4G network, it is not 4G in any sense of the term. LTE (or the 4G network) will however, be backwards compatible with HSPA and GSM/GPRS unlink WiMax. That is a whole other issue though. So i hope i cleared that up for a certain few of you who keep arguing without any actual information to back you up. Have a good night, Folks! Kronk out! |
This post has been thanked 2 times. |
|
||||
Re: HTC Pro 2 vs. Telus HSPA
Quote:
However, it's all speculation so only time will tell. I'm going to keep my fingers crossed! |
|
||||
Re: HTC Pro 2 vs. Telus HSPA
I have attached a screenshot of the band selection page in my Pro2. It is a hidden setting that I enabled.
It shows that it has the following band selections: gsm (900+1800) + UMTS(2100+900) gsm(1900+850) +UMTS (1900+850) UMTS(2100) So, I may be not a techie, but it appears to me, that you would just have to select the proper set of bands.... Am I right? Or am I not reading it correctly? |
|
|
|