![]() |
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
well a couple of things come to mind since this is Zuneware (yes I made that up...hmmm I should market this lol) Having owned the previous two Zunes the marketplace leaves much to be desired. For one, you buy things using "points" yes thats right all you XBOXers that are already be familier with Microsoft Points may or may not be happy to know this is the same concept.
Keep in mind im only specuating on my experiences with the 1st and 2nd gen Zune. Secondly, the interface was so touchy I had to turn the touchpad off (2nd gen) because there was no way to edit the speed of the cursor to my preference...which for some reason was always set to "crackhead speed" high. Im not by any means saying this is a horrible idea Im just giving all you developers some idea of what to expect given my experiences. Finally and this is what im really TRULY sceptical of, the battery life on the Zune was downright HORRIBLE. I would have a complete charge when i left my house at 9pm turn the zune off come back that moring after work at 630a amd the battery would be dead. Keep in mind that there were no running apps on my device and even if there were, powering the system down would eliminate those running apps from continuing Also as far as Developing/Hacking is conserned, the Zune required some knowledge of C# to modify/edit certain things. (I.E. design your own games) Hopefully this may still be the case with the phone. |
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion - Tim Smith's Flaming
Quote:
|
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion - Tim Smith's Flaming
Quote:
|
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
I haven't seen anything beyond speculation to indicate that a "legacy" or customizable version exists at all, other than HTC indicating that they're working to bring the "HTC experience" to WP7. That can mean ANYTHING...it could just mean they'll have some custom panels built in. I'm not saying it isn't happening, but I just am very doubtful. If you listen to Joe Belfiore's 20 minute video as well as some of Steve Ballmer's comments, it's clear that they are very interested in establishing the Windows Phone brand as something that means certain things. When asked about customization, his two examples were changing the background color of the tiles on the home page and changing from white on black text to black on white text. Maybe I'm reading too much into the examples he gave, but to me it sounds like this is how they want WP7 devices to operate. There may be customization, but I don't think they're going to allow the core user experience to be replaced, as was the case with TouchFlo/Sense.
As for this community and XDA, I give a lot of credit to everyone here, but I think we need to acknowledge a few things: First, most of the chefs are assembling things from other devices' software, leaks, and applying a lot of registry edits. Many of those things may simply not exist to be included in custom WP7 ROMs. Yes, I'm sure there will be some hacking, just has there has been even with the iPhone. And the folks here will certainly surprise me. But the selection of "ingredients" at the "grocery store" may be a lot thinner than what we're used to. Second, custom ROMs exist (at least out in the open) in no small part because Microsoft allows them to. They absolutely have the right to try to shut them down. Other than the fake guy who's tried to do that, there's no evidence Microsoft has given a crap. That's been part of their Windows Mobile strategy though -- deliver a platform and punt it to anyone who wants to license it with very little in the way of requirements or oversight. Allowing this community is consistent with that. But with the new vision of "taking more responsibility" for the user experience, they may frown on how easy this community makes it to change that experience. Whether they clamp down or how hard they do remains to be seen. But keep in mind, this is the same company that is about to roll out a feature in desktop Windows 7 that phones home every 90 days to see if your software is legal. Don't be surprised to see REAL takedown notices if they decide that's part of their "responsibility" for the user experience. |
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
Quote:
All I know for 100% is this: we have NOT see everything yet Now, what that actually translates too, I'm not sure either. That's just what I do know with certainty. That's why I think it's waaaay to early for people here to be "deciding" on what they think. Don't get me wrong: I understand 1st impressions, questions and concerns. But I'm just saying: there is more to come in the future. What and when, even I'm not sure. Quote:
As i said above, I know for a fact that what we say today wasn't everything. How Turtle/Pink (with their lower res screens, but still impressive offerings) fit in, what OEMs are going to do, etc. is still up in the air. Either way, I like what I see so far. If groups like PPCG/XDA wane because of the lack of "hacking", so be it. It's better for the broader consumer base and general experience. But I don't think it'll be too bad either. |
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
Is it me, is it the user or is it slow? This really looks laggy, it may be early software, but come on, you've had how long? http://www.slashgear.com/windows-pho...ds-on-1573973/
Edit note: nevermind, it was indicated in the page that they also saw the lag. |
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
Quote:
i just don't want it to get too iphoneish. |
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
yup... rewatch the announcement...
Balmer & co. made it CRYSTAL clear (see the dos/win95 analogy at the end w95 created new opportunities) the start/homepage/experience will NOT be changed, just added on to. MS made it CRYSTAL clear there will be one developer roadmap to avoiding confusion for developers. maybe for some corporate (not sold thru retail) release but that seems unlikely they'd just stick to wm6.5x. Quote:
|
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
laughable speculation.
iPhone (best performing one that does everything in iPhone ecosystem) is $199 and where phones are in 2010. "really expensive feature phone" is editors reaching for webhits. Quote:
|
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
Quote:
I don't know about not standing out compared to other UIs. I think the tiles being "alive" might make WP7 stand out a bit. If I walk into a store knowing nothing about phones and I see static screens everywhere except on one phone where things other than the wallpaper are moving, it might catch my eye. And if it's on the lock screen, it might give the (justified?) impression that WP7 is a more personal phone. Moving on to the Zuneness of WP7: I really like the Zune integration. I think it's a big plus. It makes me think that any WP7 phone will be a really solid media device. And that's coming from someone who's never owned a Zune. It's just based on reputation and branding. But how about people who aren't necessarily geeks and maybe will not even know about WP7 until they walk into the store and see it? Will they even know it's a Zune? Steve Ballmer was quick to point out that every WP7 device would be a Zune. From a branding standpoint, I think the Zune name is stronger than the Windows name right now in terms of handheld devices (based on my perception). So why not just call it "Windows Zune Phone" or something like that? I'm worried that non-geeks will see the Windows name and will remember that they heard that Windows mobile sucks and that semi-geeks will see the name and expect an upgrade over 6.5 (which it isn't --completely different OS and design philosophy--). By the way, there's no way it's gonna be called "Windows Phone 7 Series", right? "Series" is coming off, it'll be something like "Windows Phone 7 starter", "Windows Phone 7 Premium Media" or whatever. |
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
the UI is not revoluionary but in many respects it is because it is so simple
there are no image heavy graphics, but it works. And that is key about any UI - it works so far it looks like microsoft in my eyes has done a lot of good so far |
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
My only concern is that this will become a "Zune" phone and the windows/Pc side of it will be stripped. This was the only reason I used a windows mobile phone. If microsoft has axed the Pc out of windows phone 7 then I think XDA and other places such will still exist. They will just be limited to change and playing with old software. However, if we get really desperate... maybe some programmers will get together and build a new version of windows mobile running on WinCe 6. I'm willing to help! lol we can only dream.
|
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
Quote:
I think next month microsoft wont reveal a whole new "busniess," version or any variation of their new os. Next month they will show a more in depth look at it,business features included. Why make two versions and have fragmented features and make people choices harder, when instead you can do what everyone(palm,apple,rim,google etc) is trying to do and make ONE very powerul and fun os for both business and regular everyday use? Everyone is speaking like we got all of wps7 info yesterday. All they showed were the changes and new features of it.Only their ideas and plans. Not how it will work in the real world and how everyday use will work. Next month will show how things like push email, phone calls/texts will be handled. We will see them add songs from zune or play a xbox live "arcade" game on the device. Please everyone stop saying that their will be two or three variations of this new os. Microsoft is trying to create a cohesive environment between their pc/mobile/gaming platforms. |
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
Quote:
And I take offense at the "reaching for webhits" bit. We clearly differentiate rumor from fact on our site and don't drag posts out to get repeat hits. |
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
Quote:
I don't know, I guess if you're not into facebook and all that and you turn all of that stuff off, the phone won't seem as alive. But it's a good point...so much of the coolness of this OS depends on "the cloud". Last thing: I like how, no matter how you cut my post, you make sure to include "Great post, Smoove!" in the quote ;) |
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
I was pleasantly surprised to see it was MUCH more than an iphone copy. In fact, its not like the iPhone UI at all upon initial glance. Haven't seen enough to tell if that's the case all they way around, but I was very impressed with it.
I don't think they're too late into the game to be successful, but I do think they're late. Not to mention the fact that this STILL won't be available for at least 7-8 months. Lots of people have moved on, and they really should have aimed for a June release to try and capture some of those iPhone 3G buyers coming off contract. I haven't had time to watch the video yet, but can anyone tell me if its true that this OS won't multitask 3rd party apps? |
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
Quote:
Got a stack of cash burning a whole in my pocket till holidays 2010 |
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
Quote:
I thought it looked pretty nice, although I wasnt a fan of the blue tiles. Do something dynamic with those as well. Also throw in Bing Turn By Turn navigation ala Android, multitasking and some backwards compatibility. Ill buy. Zune Software is greeeaatt..much better than iTunes. Wireless sync for podcasts is the bees-knees. Having said that... (A little off topic) Android on Sprint sucks. When is HTC or another manu going to release a decent Android phone on Sprint? |
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
well I thought this was initially built on ce 7. its built on ce 6 which is a good thing
meizu m8 has a plethora of apps ported from wince 5.2 and cabs on windows mobile to be ported ot that device it may be a good thing for this core |
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
Quote:
you can do better. much, much, much better. ;) Pink is without a doubt a teen/tween phone series (somewhat based on a the new wm7 kernel that won't run wm7 apps obviously due to hardware and marketing limitations) that WILL no doubt be popular if properly MARKETED. Especially since carriers (USA) force $20/mo or $30/mo data plans on any phone with more than 0-9, send/stop keys. Tweens don't want old-man blackberries or super(geek)phones (droid/wm6). They text like mo'fos 24/7 and dabble in facebook while listening to free mp3s and playing games. They don't post on forums either. They can do with probably 90 minutes a month too. A couple of days ago you guys posted a roadmap of rumors and keep citing some code where HTC will disable WP7 for Sense. THAT'S NOT HAPPENING. Talking about separate ZUNE phones, Media & business editions (come on did anyone really think zune services/store would be omitted from wp7.. it's their frikin' bridge to media revenue along with games now that phones can handle the graphics). Re-read this http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=12261 I just don't get how out of touch you can be with what is happening unless it's milking web traffic. Sorry. |
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
I dont care how little customization WP7 has. If the sluggishness and behavior of my TP2 makes me want to smash it against the wall, it needs to be fixed. If lack of customization is the key to a unified UX, so be it. I love my Zune HD and wish everyday since I bought it that it was my phone.
|
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
From the looks of those videos..I'm probably going android :/...I mean just looking at it looks like a 3rd rate OS like iphone or what the instinct has. Don't get me wrong, some of the stuff on there looks nice but the UI feels so dumbed down that my head is gonna split. I mean I can replicate that UI in DOS >.>
Just like vista makes it easy for simple stuff but when you wana do something advanced it gives you a headache. Aka my guess is they abandoned the ppl who want something more out of their phone and feeding it to the masses. I know they even said its not a pc and they want to differentiate, but some of us want a pc in our hands >.>..if they could have just made wm6.5 more customizable and make it more efficient while getting their hardware people to make it with decent processors/gpus that would have been perfect. I am clearly not impressed...:protest: |
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
Quote:
just not what typical wm users are used to. considering these guys are actually in spain this week, i'll regard their opinion with a little clout than yours. |
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
Quote:
and yet no one there seems to have ever heard the term Google for some reason :/ |
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
Slighty digressing here, yet staying on the topic of Windows Phone 7 Series <3
1- What?! where is the cool Zune HD keyboard, http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/tim//20...81_540x405.JPG I'm hoping they just didn't finish porting it to WVGA 2- plain dial pad? http://cache-03.gawkerassets.com/ass...mg_4617_01.jpg They emphasize that OEMs would not be able to change the interface, what about alternate Software Input such as Swype, for example, another innovative intuitive and effective way to type on a Series 7 Phone with no keyboard. |
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
Quote:
http://pocketnow.com/news-archive/ht...-book-touch-ui This ui made no sense to me prior to watching the wp7s presentation. Now it does! And I am completely sure this will be the next UI for wpseries smartphones. It took me a long time to find this |
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
no disrespect to HTC - they make good, not great phones - but they are a HARDWARE maker not a software difference maker. Their software initiative has hit a dead end.
Their software is already LOCKED OUT OF iPhone, blackberry and soon now Windows 7 Phone. What's left? Hooo-rah! It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see they'll be paiting themselves into a small corner... limiting the HTC Experience to non-smart HTC "feature phones" and htc-branded android devices within 9 months. That is pretty steep odds working against them for a major software initiative with no chance of "marketplace" revenue. And you all know the "pink" stuff is essentially zune feature phone so once WP7 ships microsoft can easily leverage that market too - against HTC. Quote:
|
Re: Windows Phone 7 Discussion
Quote:
the problem is that we still have no idea about WP7s until MIX plus the code from sense...just doesn't substantiate your speculation at all. In fact, it detracts |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:37 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2012 - PPCGeeks.com