PPCGeeks - [FINAL] OMJ's HTC EVO 2.2 Custom ROM v4.6 | FroYo 3.70.651.1

PPCGeeks (http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/index.php)

- CDMA HTC Evo 4G Development (http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/forumdisplay.php?f=210)

- - [FINAL] OMJ's HTC EVO 2.2 Custom ROM v4.6 | FroYo 3.70.651.1 | *Updated 3/29/11* (http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/showthread.php?t=123534)

Re: OMJ's HTC EVO 2.2 Custom ROM v3.0 | FroYo 3.26.651.6 | *Updated 8/13/10*

Quote:

Originally Posted by juancaperez2000 (Post 1919451)

i dont try #3 tried 7 and its really good, now im testing #4 and it fell really smooth and look like will be providing better battery

I'm running kingklicks CFS#7 too and very happy; everything is smooth and the battery seems pretty good.

I didn't go with the BFS due to reports of problems but it seems like there is a lot of positive feedback on #4 so I may have to give it a try.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DCLocal (Post 1919740)

You should move to #4 its so good better than #7 promisse you

Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk

Re: OMJ's HTC EVO 2.2 Custom ROM v3.0 | FroYo 3.26.651.6 | *Updated 8/13/10*

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkc90 (Post 1919692)

Im lost like always lol...what is amo ra??

N in the to reply he talks bout root 1??

I dnt get it sorry !

Quote:

Originally Posted by juancaperez2000 (Post 1919749)

You should move to #4 its so good better than #7 promisse you

Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk

Careful what you promise Bro :)
Not all devices respond the same to custom kernels.
For example netarchy's kernel will allow 1.2 OC but not all devices can handle that--mine for example. I can take her to 1.19 but as soon as I go for 1.2 she locks up tighter than a virgin on Prom Night :evil4:
Thanks for your input, definitely good to hear that kernel works so well. We need to try them all out for ourselves (ESPECIALLY for battery life) and see how our individual devices respond.

Re: OMJ's HTC EVO 2.2 Custom ROM v3.0 | FroYo 3.26.651.6 | *Updated 8/13/10*

Quote:

Originally Posted by juancaperez2000 (Post 1919749)

You should move to #4 its so good better than #7 promisse you

Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk

I did both and think I like #7 better, why do you like #4 more?

Quote:

Originally Posted by DavidMMorley (Post 1919867)

I did both and think I like #7 better, why do you like #4 more?

Battery life

Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk

Re: OMJ's HTC EVO 2.2 Custom ROM v3.0 | FroYo 3.26.651.6 | *Updated 8/13/10*

Quote:

Originally Posted by DCLocal (Post 1919740)

I'm gonna give #4 a try also... Maybe OMJ might put out his next ROM with kingKlick's kernels next time... Or maybe a 3rd choice :D...

I'm gonna get that BFS #4 and give it a try... CFS #7 has been running pretty good..

Re: OMJ's HTC EVO 2.2 Custom ROM v3.0 | FroYo 3.26.651.6 | *Updated 8/13/10*

Quote:

Originally Posted by iknowsquat (Post 1919811)

amon RA recovery is the custom recovery all the cool people use :D
We have two options for custom recoveries-amon and Clockwork.
Clockwork comes with ROM Manager but after you flash it you can scroll down to the bottom of your Menu and select Flash Alternate Recovery and from there flash amon RA.
They are essentially the same but if you are having trouble with Clockwork then try amon.

Have you heard from xfreak44??? Seems like he had to go change out his EVO.. Poor Guy... Which brings me to my point, can't you adb shell and push a flash recovery to the phone? Isn't that the way we all got root? I forgot to give xfreak44 that idea.

Careful what you promise Bro :)
Not all devices respond the same to custom kernels.
For example netarchy's kernel will allow 1.2 OC but not all devices can handle that--mine for example. I can take her to 1.19 but as soon as I go for 1.2 she locks up tighter than a virgin on Prom Night :evil4:
Thanks for your input, definitely good to hear that kernel works so well. We need to try them all out for ourselves (ESPECIALLY for battery life) and see how our individual devices respond.

I crashed using netarchy's also.. LOCKED up... First time that's happened. What worries me about the kernels is that they are updating on a daily basis, so I decided to stick with CFS#7 which kingklick hadn't updated in over a week.
I've been staying away from netarchy cuz he's been updating daily almost.. Usually that means (IMO) bugs, or "naked rabid bunnies" running ramped as netarchy would say... :D

Re: OMJ's HTC EVO 2.2 Custom ROM v3.0 | FroYo 3.26.651.6 | *Updated 8/13/10*

I made the move to kingklick's BFS #4 and so far so good. I'll need to give a few days before I can comment on battery but initially it seems as smooth as CFS #7 that I was using before and very happy with.

Honestly, there is nothing better than nand backup; it makes all this taste-testing so easy and fairly carefree! :D

Re: OMJ's HTC EVO 2.2 Custom ROM v3.0 | FroYo 3.26.651.6 | *Updated 8/13/10*

Quote:

Originally Posted by richarc93 (Post 1920043)

I havent heard from xfreak. Yes, you can flash recovery that way which is why I suggested it :)
He successfully flashed amon via ROM Manager and then did the manual flash anyway. Didnt help.

Not saying its the only way but the most common lock ups with a custom kernel are going to come from trying to OC too high like I did. Netarchy's .8 bfs is running great, trying it today without Set CPU and see what it does.
Like I said before any kernel mod will respond differently across ROMs and across devices. Think of a kernel release not as a ROM release (ie final version) but as a beta. They NEED us to flash the kernels to make sure they are working correctly across the different variables.

Anyone figured out how to change their bootscreen?

Sent from my "tricked out EVO" using tapatalk