[ Discontinued ][ v4.2 ][ 6.5.x / 6.5 / 6.1 ] Calkulin's Visual VGA Kitchen & ROMs - Page 80

**Calkulin** · #**791** (**permalink**) 12-29-2008, 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xzjn9p

OS Versions.

I've been following this thread and a while back Calcu stated that 20931 was superior to 19974 and hence the change. Since then its gone from 20931 -> 20940 -> 20954... Am I to assume that 20954 >> 20931 > 19974? I'm sure there are reasons. I'm just curious what the benefits are.

thanks

20954 is running on my phone better than 20940, 20931 & 19974 did. It's a little quicker than the rest of them but I can't call it more reliable yet as I've only had it for a couple of days but so far it does seem so

xzjn9p · #**792** (**permalink**) 12-29-2008, 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Calcu

20954 is running on my phone better than 20940, 20931 & 19974 did. It's a little quicker than the rest of them but I can't call it more reliable yet as I've only had it for a couple of days but so far it does seem so

Thanks looking forward to trying this out when my diamond arrives in a couple days.

**lawmangrant** · #**793** (**permalink**) 12-29-2008, 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Calcu

20954 is running on my phone better than 20940, 20931 & 19974 did. It's a little quicker than the rest of them but I can't call it more reliable yet as I've only had it for a couple of days but so far it does seem so

I have had this for a couple of days, and I can say the speed is amazing. Very very very quick.

My phone has run quite stable as well, I don't think that I have hard reset since I flashed to my newest build.

**Drybonz** · #**794** (**permalink**) 12-29-2008, 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Calcu

20954 is running on my phone better than 20940, 20931 & 19974 did. It's a little quicker than the rest of them but I can't call it more reliable yet as I've only had it for a couple of days but so far it does seem so

20954 is very nice. However, I found the battery life to be better on 20940.

**indagroove** · #**795** (**permalink**) 12-29-2008, 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Calcu

20954 is running on my phone better than 20940, 20931 & 19974 did. It's a little quicker than the rest of them but I can't call it more reliable yet as I've only had it for a couple of days but so far it does seem so

Personally, I am still preferring 19974.

**SOHKis** · #**796** (**permalink**) 12-29-2008, 03:00 PM

i found 19974 to be pretty quick, haven't been on 20954 long enough to really tell. plus i gotta make a few changes to the most recent ROM i've cooked. hope to get another out today.

sent a few beers your way calcu, thanks as always!

binder7 · #**797** (**permalink**) 12-29-2008, 03:13 PM

I have not tried this new release yet. I am downloading it now. However, in all other versions, i always have a problem with the email connecting to gmail. Sometimes it wont download my new messages, and sometimes it will randomly delete my messages off my phone. Has anyone else experienced anything like this or knows of a way to fix this. Sorry if this has already been discussed.
Thanks

**Calkulin** · #**798** (**permalink**) 12-29-2008, 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by indagroove

Personally, I am still preferring 19974.

19974 did seem to initialize programs a little faster but no PIE 6 and the slight memory leak are really the only negatives to it, besides that, it's was my favorite SYS until 20954 came around

Quote:

Originally Posted by binder7

I have not tried this new release yet. I am downloading it now. However, in all other versions, i always have a problem with the email connecting to gmail. Sometimes it wont download my new messages, and sometimes it will randomly delete my messages off my phone. Has anyone else experienced anything like this or knows of a way to fix this. Sorry if this has already been discussed.
Thanks

I personally don't use gmail, so I can't say but try it and let me know if it still doesn't work and I'll open a account to test it

**boggsie** · #**799** (**permalink**) 12-29-2008, 04:21 PM

I am very new to the Diamond, coming from the vogue.

I generally use the same application setup ... the device it is as much as a day-planner (schedule, tasks, contacts) as a communication device (phone, email, txt).

I was using 20931 for a couple of days, but found or felt that battery life was very poor ... on both days I had to plug in to get some juice.

With this build of 20954 I am just about through my work day and I am still above 50%.

The obvious caveat is that I am new to the diamond and this is purely non-scientific observation with very few data points.

Best regards,
-boggsie

trakas · #**800** (**permalink**) 12-29-2008, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boggsie

I am very new to the Diamond, coming from the vogue.

I generally use the same application setup ... the device it is as much as a day-planner (schedule, tasks, contacts) as a communication device (phone, email, txt).

I was using 20931 for a couple of days, but found or felt that battery life was very poor ... on both days I had to plug in to get some juice.

With this build of 20954 I am just about through my work day and I am still above 50%.

The obvious caveat is that I am new to the diamond and this is purely non-scientific observation with very few data points.

Best regards,
-boggsie

Hi ,
What radio You are?
My personall expierence that diferent sys (or roms) acting diferent with radio.With telus radio i got more bars and exellent batery on 20759.One bar more than on newer 20954 or 19974.Can sombody coment on that?