This post has been thanked 7 times. |
|
||||
Re: 3+ weeks w/ the pre (vs sprint touch pro)
the pre is an excellent phone I will agree. But this is another one of those iphone or touch pro discussions. If you set the iphone, pre, and TP side by side, you will have people that prefer each one over the other two. The TP is a weak phone with the stock operating system, plain and simple. In my experience, so are most other windows mobile devices. Bottom line is, windows mobile is for people who enjoy tweaking/modding their phone. If you are willing to take the time to do the necessary mods, windows mobile will blow any other phone/os out of the water, but out of the box, both the iphone and the pre blow the TP out of the water. My biggest complaint with the pre, is the same as my biggest complaint with the iphone. It is too user friendly. The pre and the iphone are both flashy, neat little devices, but they both lack the functionality and multitasking ability of windows mobile. bottom line is, there is no way to determine which device is the better device, because it depends on the person using it. I have direct access to all three phones, and i still wouldnt trade my TP for anything on the market right now. even so, the pre definately is a nice phone, with alot of nice features, and well worth looking into if you find windows mobile too cumbersome.
|
This post has been thanked 6 times. |
|
||||
Re: 3+ weeks w/ the pre (vs sprint touch pro)
i disagree with the BT statement, personally i get better BT quality with my Pre. I have a MOTO T505 and when i use the Touch Pro or my Diamond to stream music using FM i get a bunch of static/white noise in the background when i keep the phone it the holster or case. When using the Palm Pre, i dont hear as much, if any static.
|
|
||||
Re: 3+ weeks w/ the pre (vs sprint touch pro)
Quote:
I'll wait and see how WebOS matures over the next year. Wouldn't pay $600 for what I consider a WebOS prototype. without a doubt WebOS is nice... |
|
||||
Re: 3+ weeks w/ the pre (vs sprint touch pro)
Quote:
|
|
||||
Re: 3+ weeks w/ the pre (vs sprint touch pro)
Quote:
Don't get me wrong. I *love* tinkering with my phone. there's nothing stock on my wm65 sprint touch pro. That's another reason I like the pre though.. all the code (on the rooted pre) is easy to change, it's baiscally running linux, and there's people that have setup source repositories for downloading patching/applying them (or you can just go in an edit the text.. it's all text!) - VERY hackable.. for now.. -mark |
|
||||
Re: 3+ weeks w/ the pre (vs sprint touch pro)
Quote:
I think alot of the cutouts that I get on the pre is because it's not playing as nice as other phones in switching channels/etc.. there's so much interference in san francisco downtown.. My touch pro is *much* more reliable in regards to the bluetooth.. so funny that you have the opposite experience. -mark |
|
||||
Re: 3+ weeks w/ the pre (vs sprint touch pro)
The bluetooth range on my Pre is much better than my T-Pro too.
I have to turn off the T505 when I leave the car because the Pre will stay connected at ot home and certain palces at work. Not to mention it actually auto-connects itself. Something the T-Pro NEVER did reliabky.
__________________
Phone: Touch Pro
Skinned Cat ROM: 20771 SYS w/ FPOS 3E XIP cooked in Calu's v1.3 Kitchen w/ Calcu 20954 & PPCKitchen OEMs Skinned Cat Return: 21232 SYS + Modded eRice Ktichen + lots different bits = Joy (O.o) Radio: Sprint 1.11.00F |
|
||||
Re: 3+ weeks w/ the pre (vs sprint touch pro)
The bluetooth range on my Pre is much better than my T-Pro too.
I have to turn off the T505 when I leave the car because the Pre will stay connected at ot home and certain palces at work. Not to mention it actually auto-connects itself. Something the T-Pro NEVER did reliabky. |
|
|
|