Quote:
Originally Posted by dishe
I don't understand... why are we so sure this isn't the same technology as AGPS?
The definition of AGPS is a location fix that uses tower triangulation to find the rough area that the phone exists, then often a simplified onboard GPS chip will confirm and get a more accurate fix based on this data.
|
It's not aGPS.
Cellular triangulation is just a less accurate form used, even for e911 purposes.
aGPS is actually quite accurate and faster than standalone GPS units (sometimes, SiRF III chipsets are fast, but are susceptible to landmark interference, which aGPS avoids)
The reason why it's not aGPS? If it were, it'd be just like TeleNav which Sprint charges $2.99 day/ $10 a month for--that system gives you "live" information about where you are and where you are moving to.
Cellular Triangulation, otoh, is not that accurate and is not good if you are constantly moving, but it requires no special aGPS chipsets either.
By this logic, you cannot use the "drive by directions" feature of MS Live. If it
were aGPS, you could--but then why buy TeleNav?
Either way, both systems require APIs to transmit/translate the information for a specific app (here MS Live) and there is zero evidence that Sprint has done this for either regular triangulation or aGPS on PPC devices.