NEW HTC Touch and HTC Mogul replacements announced from Sprint! (engadgetmobile) - Page 2

specv · #11 (**permalink**) 04-23-2008, 09:38 AM

did anyone notice aGPS listed in the specs

booooo

**TweetyBear** · #12 (**permalink**) 04-23-2008, 09:46 AM

posted already

**Success100** · #13 (**permalink**) 04-23-2008, 09:49 AM

http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/showthread.php?t=24710

slbailey1 · #14 (**permalink**) 04-23-2008, 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by specv

did anyone notice aGPS listed in the specs

booooo

Yes it will have aGPS

SprintTouch08 · #15 (**permalink**) 04-23-2008, 10:08 AM

yeh agps is there. poor poor Palm 800, itll be old and outdated before it even hits.... compared to these guys 2 months after.

**Success100** · #16 (**permalink**) 04-23-2008, 10:09 AM

http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/showthread.php?t=24710

TheShaz · #17 (**permalink**) 04-23-2008, 11:28 AM

Looks like its bigger - more inline with the iPhone in size

xcopmanx · #18 (**permalink**) 04-23-2008, 11:58 AM

I noticed the aGPS thing too. Lame! I'm glad I have a bluetooth gps puck, but obviously I'd rather not carry one around. My Sanyo M1 had GREAT GPS. All I did was use Garmin, and didn't have to download maps. It pulled them down via EVDO or x1. Obviously static maps on the phone might have helped in certain cases when I didn't have service, but it was GREAT! Owning the touch, at least in the navigation aspect, is disappointing and usually when i buy a phone, I'm looking for an upgrade. aGPS would be disappointing but not a deal killer for me.

storino03 · #19 (**permalink**) 04-23-2008, 12:36 PM

I just hope the specs don't change in the process. Looks to be a solid device.

--James

**Certs** · #20 (**permalink**) 04-23-2008, 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Success100

http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/showthread.php?t=24710

trying to get on centralized thread on this, the one above is the largest. report there!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Success100

http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/showthread.php?t=24710

PMing one of us is a lot more efficient than double/triple posting.

But yes, 2 threads on the same topic are not necessary.