Quote:
Originally Posted by jug6ernaut
Umm yea
1st. Installs fast: umm yea...has absolutely nothing to do with a ROMs performance.
2nd. Boots fast: again has absolutionly nothing to do with a roms performance
3rd. Opens Webpages fast: more has to do with Browser and Version of browser then specs of Rom
4th. Plays Videos without delay: Probable the only thing that could be considred a test of a roms perfrormance.
|
Philosophical question - what do you call a fast rom?
I do believe that if a chef puts time into optimizing installation/boot sequence/video tuning this will be reflected in overall speed as well.
Quote:
|
Tho non of these are really effected by video driver as most likly they are not hardware accelerated. If they are then i concur.
|
I think they are, at least partially.
Update - see this -
http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/showthread.php?t=57282
Quote:
|
FileSystem: i would suggest finding a large word file and then timing how long each rom takes to open and completly render that file. IMO this would be a much better test then any you are currently using.
|
This would be somewhat duplicate to video test. Video playback speed depends both on filesystem speed and video driver. Lags in video driver slow down UI as well.
Quote:
|
3G: Why not use a simple download speed test? Tho your rendering of website test is good but flawed in that not all roms have same browser.
|
I did not want to separate browser version and connection performance on purpose - this way it reflects real world speed better.
Quote:
|
dll...lol which dll's are you referring to?
|
Whatever is in boot sequence.
05-14-2009, 03:51 PM
Hybrid Mode
