Sashimi vs UCAutoinstall

[ebuechler3]

Originally Posted by LilRico

UC for me... It's too easy...

I didn't understand Sashimi...

thats weird. i couldnt understand uc but sashimi was eeeeeeeeeeaaasy as hell for me!!!

[chazybaz13]

sushimiakiu is lame, if it was so great it could do the cab installs and backup restores on its own.

[zikronix]

Originally Posted by chazybaz13

sushimiakiu is lame, if it was so great it could do the cab installs and backup restores on its own.

It could if a chef would actully build the complaince support in to the rom...I dont see wht they dont...us ans sashimi wouldnt conflict with each other

[indagroove]

Originally Posted by chazybaz13

sushimiakiu is lame, if it was so great it could do the cab installs and backup restores on its own.

Originally Posted by zikronix

It could if a chef would actully build the complaince support in to the rom...I dont see wht they dont...us ans sashimi wouldnt conflict with each other

Sashimi compliancy is built into my rom. It will auto install your cabs in the auto>cabs folder on your SD card, so long as you already have shashimi installed to SD.

Sashimi is super easy -- just drag and drop. No code to write. Also does exe, reg, xml, etc...

[rstoyguy]

UC hasn't let me down yet, so I'm not gonna learn Sushi... Or whatever it is, I usually cook everything in.

[darnell]

Originally Posted by crazaytalent

...not every rom is UC capable yet... still a lot of chefs, who dont even know how to do it, so you cant do UC on everyrom, but you can do sashimi on every rom...

That's the reason I give Sashimi the nod big time. It does not matter what ROM I'm using, once Sashimi is configured, I can install my stuff on whatever ROM. It does not matter if the ROM cook ever heard of UC. So the ROM cook can focus on other ROM customizations, because once I've got Sashimi configured I'm set for anybody's ROM.

[redd214]

after using both im stickin with uc

[parkjam]

I like UC because it allows me to tweak on a per ROM basis. I can just go into y SDConfig file and drop // before a line I don't want it to run because it is cooked into the ROM. I find that very handy when working with a lot of programs that some chefs include and some don't. If I was to do that with Sashimi, I would have to delete files from the CAB directory, and then copy them back next time, and try to remember what programs I wanted and I didn't want. With SDConfig, the next ROM comes along, if it doesn't have google maps, I can just open that SDConfig file and delete the two slashes and blamo, it installs it for the new ROM.

[slypher]

Originally Posted by parkjam

I like UC because it allows me to tweak on a per ROM basis. I can just go into y SDConfig file and drop // before a line I don't want it to run because it is cooked into the ROM. I find that very handy when working with a lot of programs that some chefs include and some don't. If I was to do that with Sashimi, I would have to delete files from the CAB directory, and then copy them back next time, and try to remember what programs I wanted and I didn't want. With SDConfig, the next ROM comes along, if it doesn't have google maps, I can just open that SDConfig file and delete the two slashes and blamo, it installs it for the new ROM.

This is the exact reason that I like UC. I like to have a bit more control over what gets installed without actually messing with the cabs (deleting or changing folders, etc).

Sashimi sounds interesting, but I don't really have a need to venture into the unknown cause UC doesn't let me down.

-s

[1999TL]

Originally Posted by slypher

This is the exact reason that I like UC. I like to have a bit more control over what gets installed without actually messing with the cabs (deleting or changing folders, etc).

Sashimi sounds interesting, but I don't really have a need to venture into the unknown cause UC doesn't let me down.

-s

What do you do when your config is running into problems and you want to see if it's the rom or your setup? Your UC is running right off the bat...