TP2 & TP1 Are The Same Spec Wise, Why Is The TP2 So Much Better?

[chappy]

Originally Posted by EGOvoruhk

Uhhhhhhh.....

http://www.htc.com/www/product/touch...ification.html
http://www.htc.com/www/product/touch...ification.html

You guys were saying?

You might wanna look at the cdma versions. That's one of the reasons the ATT version is called the Tilt and Tilt II.

http://www.htc.com/us/product/touchp...ification.html
http://www.htc.com/us/product/touchp...ification.html

http://www.htc.com/us/product/touchp...ification.html
http://www.htc.com/us/product/touchp...ification.html

You were saying?

[EGOvoruhk]

Originally Posted by chappy

You might wanna look at the cdma versions

The CDMA versions look awkward when you compare them, because of the added GSM support. The GSM versions are easier to compare:

http://www.htc.com/us/product/atttil...ification.html
http://www.htc.com/us/product/htcfuz...ification.html

Originally Posted by chappy

That's one of the reasons the ATT version is called the Tilt and Tilt II.

No it's not, it's just AT&T trying to market it. The T-Mobile is GSM, and it's called the Touch Pro2. It's also called the Touch Pro2 in Europe as well

Also, the original AT&T Tilt is not based off of the Touch Pro. It's based off of the TyTN II/Kaiser/P4550

Originally Posted by chappy

You were saying?

I was saying that the TP1 and TP2 run the same chipset, and HTC specifications I just posted prove that

[tpeazy]

Originally Posted by EGOvoruhk

The CDMA versions look awkward when you compare them, because of the added GSM support. The GSM versions are easier to compare:

http://www.htc.com/us/product/atttil...ification.html
http://www.htc.com/us/product/htcfuz...ification.html



No it's not, it's just AT&T trying to market it. The T-Mobile is GSM, and it's called the Touch Pro2. It's also called the Touch Pro2 in Europe as well

Also, the original AT&T Tilt is not based off of the Touch Pro. It's based off of the TyTN II/Kaiser/P4550



I was saying that the TP1 and TP2 run the same chipset, and HTC specifications I just posted prove that

I agree that the Tilt is just a marketing gimmick...just a name. But the CDMA versions use a newer chipset then the original. So just to be clear...The Sprint/Verizon TP2s have a newer chipset then the Sprint/Verizon TP's and also then the GSM/WCDMA ATT Tilt2 and T-Mobile Touch Pro 2.

That is a fact. The GSM side of the aisle got screwed on this one.

Tp

[EGOvoruhk]

Originally Posted by tpeazy

But the CDMA versions use a newer chipset then the original. So just to be clear...The Sprint/Verizon TP2s have a newer chipset then the Sprint/Verizon TP's and also then the GSM/WCDMA ATT Tilt2 and T-Mobile Touch Pro 2

I suppose, but it's only newer because they needed to add GSM support. If you compare a GSM Touch Pro2 with a CDMA Touch Pro2, the CDMA one isn't going to perform any better/faster, and that's what this thread is all about, asking why the TP2 performs better than the TP1, and that answer can only be speculated upon by us

My guess would be the obvious one, and just be the fact that HTC had more time to mess with the hardware. More time to tweak TF3D, make drivers, etc...