Back of Sprint touch pro 2 is the ugliest of them all. - Page 3

**themuffinman** · #21 (**permalink**) 08-06-2009, 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hperry

screw the back. if you touched a sprint touch pro 2, tell us if it had a 3.5mm headphone jack!

Honestly at this point it is pretty safe to assume that it will have it. Obviously the telus and the verizon version has it so why wouldn't sprint. Also someone posted the official specs and it specifically mentioned that it will have the 3.5mm jack.

**mlin** · #22 (**permalink**) 08-06-2009, 06:49 PM

First of all, how did you get your hands on one?

Second, I like the Sprint back a lot and I'm happy to see you say it is made of grippy rubber. I was certainly hoping so. Matter of opinion I guess... Did it have a 3.5mm headphone jack?

**Dragon2** · #23 (**permalink**) 08-06-2009, 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by themuffinman

I honestly don't give a damn about what the back of the phone looks like. I mean come on, is any of us going to just sit there and just look at the battery cover? Now I could understand if the sprint version was alot thicker or didn't have the 3.5mm jack or if any other features of the phone ended up being gimped for whatever reason but at the end of the day is the batery cover really going to make a difference?

This had me laughing my aszzzz off, I could just picture this nepolian dynomite looking dude staring at the back of the pro 2... no ****, screw the back, let me have it nowwwwwwwww...

rawdikrik · #24 (**permalink**) 08-06-2009, 07:18 PM

Aahh...

No "This thread is worthless wihtout pics" smiley.

**slypher** · #25 (**permalink**) 08-06-2009, 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rawdikrik

Aahh...

No "This thread is worthless wihtout pics" smiley.

+1!

-s

wud_e · #26 (**permalink**) 08-06-2009, 11:51 PM

Says you. I think the Sprint one looks the best out of all that I've seen. Where are picks of the Telus and AT&T Versions? Is this even going to AT&T? The Sprint one reminds me of the MS Zune Tatoos. It's slick as heck!

Vertech · #27 (**permalink**) 08-07-2009, 07:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rawdikrik

Aahh...

No "This thread is worthless wihtout pics" smiley.

+1
Pics or it never happened I say! And yep my main concern is if we get a little 3.5mm plug action.

kevm14 · #28 (**permalink**) 08-07-2009, 08:39 AM

I much prefer the reference design rear cover. The Sprint version looks like some kinda toy. And it also looks different enough that I question functionality. But we'll see. If it performs, I can always look past aesthetics. But I will never take form before function, ever.

**Hypnotic2010** · #29 (**permalink**) 08-07-2009, 08:47 AM

Im kinda diggin the back cover too. If its rubberized, it means less slip, and less scratches.

wchamblee · #30 (**permalink**) 08-07-2009, 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kgnupe2

How do you go from the best touch pro to the worst touch pro 2
I have just touched the sprint touch pro 2 and its ugly the back is a rubber slip-proof back with orange-redish holes. I believe they did it for slip protection and ventalation.

The verizon one is beautiful
THe tmolible one is nice just an off color but still nice
THe telus one is perfect
Even the at&T one is better
Sprint tried to get cute and make theres stand out well it stands out and is ugly as crap I guess i have to buy the telus back for my sprint touch pro 2 and it will be released on the 6th but corp will get it a week earlier.
The only ones that will fit the sprint one is the verizon and telus all the rest will not fit and the att one dont have a 3.5 as of now

Back of the phone- Minor
Getting the phone after waiting a year-MAJOR