Back of Sprint touch pro 2 is the ugliest of them all.

[Carla]

Originally Posted by RockSta®

Do you guys realize how much you complain? its a battery cover guys come on!!!! We got our TP battery covers that we didnt like modded right?? Come on let it go. Verizon geeks are saying they hate the "world map" sprint ppl hate the rubberized cover with holes, if it was the other way around then it would be the same amount of complaining. You ever realized people always like the things they are NOT getting? If the one they want now was the one they were getting originally they would not want it but want the other which they would not have wanted........get it?

Originally Posted by BRIVERS73

It's just a battery cover....

I agree COMPLETELY lol...It's just a battery cover....I actually like it, it looks neat to me

[Alksion]

I think they could have done a little better, just like I was dissapointed with the "sprint-a-fied" TP cover. Though right now I am just cool with it coming out, so whatever I guess.

[jimmiekain]

I'm not worried about the back... its that ugly user interface i dont like! The clock is super fugly! The flip clock that comes on the gsm "non sprint" devices look 1000 times better than that funny lookin clock sprint put on there touch pro and new touch pro 2.

[slopokdave]

Originally Posted by jimmiekain

I'm not worried about the back... its that ugly user interface i dont like! The clock is super fugly! The flip clock that comes on the gsm "non sprint" devices look 1000 times better than that funny lookin clock sprint put on there touch pro and new touch pro 2.

I would hold judgement until you see a release version. The only pics we have of the interface of the Sprint TP2 are months old.... I doubt that was a release version of TouchFLO.

-Dave

[jjday7]

it could be worst guys and have a yellow highlight to it to copy sprint colors. now that would be ugly. I do think verizon got the best one. I like the silver. all I can say is you'll be happy to not have a thousand finger prints on it.

[boredandtattooed]

Originally Posted by orlandojumpoff

uhh... if you touched the sprint tp2, why don't you tell us if there was a 3.5mm headphone jack. the back is a matter of opinion, but we would all want the 3.5mm jack.

we ALL do?? the day i factor in a 3.5 headphone jack in my decision to buy a $700 phone is the day i die personally.. such a small feature, that if ur on sprint your not used to anyways, so who cares really... the dongle work just fine.. besides itd be on the bottom anyways, dumbest place in the world for it... have fun pluggin in your headphones, while its in the case, im sure it wont fit right...

Originally Posted by Young_breedent

I just want the damn phone i will ***** about how much i like or dislike the back cover once it's in my hands. C'mon sprint what is the problem here. You seem to not care that you are losing customers

how are they losing customers over it??/ have u left sprint cuz the device is not here yet???

Originally Posted by eladiogomes

Hi Guys,

I'm new here, but I have to agree with this guy, why this is getting so long?! Does anyone knows if we have a date yet?!

why is it getting so long??? TP hasnt even been out a yr yet... their hardly wasting time.. its around the corner anyways

Originally Posted by themuffinman

Honestly at this point it is pretty safe to assume that it will have it. Obviously the telus and the verizon version has it so why wouldn't sprint. Also someone posted the official specs and it specifically mentioned that it will have the 3.5mm jack.

this is bad logic... ATT TP has a forward facing camera, wheres mine?? Sprint TP has 288mbs VZW has half that... its kinda nieve to assume just because one carriers device has a feature, that means it will on another carrier with the same devce... hell if thats true, wheres my FM Radio on my TP LOL

[unclutchable]

Originally Posted by boredandtattooed

this is bad logic... ATT TP has a forward facing camera, wheres mine?? Sprint TP has 288mbs VZW has half that... its kinda nieve to assume just because one carriers device has a feature, that means it will on another carrier with the same devce... hell if thats true, wheres my FM Radio on my TP LOL

AT&T is a GSM carrier. GSM carriers support video calling, hence the forward facing camera. No CDMA carriers support video calling yet, so the front 0.3MP camera is useless.

[themuffinman]

this is bad logic... ATT TP has a forward facing camera, wheres mine?? Sprint TP has 288mbs VZW has half that... its kinda nieve to assume just because one carriers device has a feature, that means it will on another carrier with the same devce... hell if thats true, wheres my FM Radio on my TP LOL

Dude come on, we all know the reason why the cdma versions wont have the front facing camera. I thought I mentioned telus and vzw which are both cdma versions. I am not making comparisons between gsm and cdma and so what if the verizon tp1 had half the ram thats not what I am talking about, I am talking about the tp2 so please don't call me names. Oh and the correct spelling is NAIVE.

[bigchico67]

I can't wait til Sprint supports video conferencing, that will be an awesome day, but I am still exited for the 3.5mm jack, but I am not jumping up and down because of it.

[horndoctor]

Is it supposed to have a voice changer built in?