Originally Posted by p-slim (Post 1451281)

tmobile is capitalizing on a certain market, which is what every company should do. tmobile doesn't have the majority of high end customers or business users. My point is i travel alot and i know voice serive for tmobile is spotty there is no way in hell i'm getting that, the majority of the US doesn't cross states that often, so if i live in an area where tmobile gets good service and i don't travel that much, of course i'm going to go with tmobile because they have the cheapest plans. the fact that you're even trying to say that tmobile has as good service as sprint is beyond me and tells me that you must not travel that much or you're just playing devils advocate because you've said their plans are cheaper, now you're saying their voice service is better, so why the hell do you have a sprint phone?

Originally Posted by SaltyDawg (Post 1451366)

I have a Sprint phone and plan because Sprint is cheaper- at least the referral plan that I am on is cheaper.

I have personally been plenty of places where Sprint has no voice service and T-Mobile does. Doesn't mean it's like that everywhere, but I am not the one claiming my experience represents everyone either.

Originally Posted by p-slim (Post 1451349)

they would be losing customers every quarter because they by far have the worst customer service by far without a shadow of a doubt, thats why. They are not losing customers because of coverage. I just checked and it seems im right, tmobile has the best customer service of them all and sprint has the worse.

Originally Posted by p-slim (Post 1451370)

your experience isn't the majority and thats whay i'm going off of. To the majority of the people they don't get as good service as they do with sprint, thats the bottome line.

Originally Posted by p-slim (Post 1451304)

wow salty, you really don't know what you're talking about. the reason other coutries didn't go with cdma over gsm has alot to do with geographics and the infracture of how that country is set up. in other countries it wouldve been alot harder to set their infracture up with cdma technology so they went with gsm towers and technology. their are alot of underlying factors that I will not get into.

Originally Posted by SaltyDawg (Post 1451366)

I have a Sprint phone and plan because Sprint is cheaper- at least the referral plan that I am on is cheaper.

I have personally been plenty of places where Sprint has no voice service and T-Mobile does. Doesn't mean it's like that everywhere, but I am not the one claiming my experience represents everyone either.

Originally Posted by rorytmeadows (Post 1451352)

Can we agree on SOMETHING? Let's say aren't cheeseburgers delicious?

Originally Posted by SaltyDawg (Post 1451379)

Totally false. If CDMA was technologically superior, as you falsely claim, then they would have went with CDMA instead.

There are countries (Canada) that initially went with CDMA, changing to GSM now. So don;t giuve me that bull about them just choosing GSM because it was easier. They had a nationwide, working CDMA network, and are going through all the trouble to change to GSM.

Originally Posted by p-slim (Post 1451314)

whether you want to believe it or not, they said they can do it and thats that. now you're calling them a liar, thats a different story. As of right now they said they can do it so we have to go off that.

Originally Posted by SaltyDawg (Post 1451390)

I'm not the only one calling them a liar. In fact, I haven't seen one single person in the know who actually believes it. Did you read the comments inthe link rorytmeadows posted? Nobody buys that BS.

it's like saying they are the only network in the world who could change from CDMA to GSM with an overnight software upgrade. Utterly ridiculous.