|
||||
Re: What is a better phone HTC EVO or HTC THUNDERBOLT?
Just curious. To those who have played with both phones, do you think the difference between the two is enough to justify paying $69-$79 dollars a month on sprint compared to paying $89-$99 dollars a month on verizon. Keep in mind that This Verizon price doesnt include visual voice mail while sprint does. I doesn't include verizon navigation but sprint includes sprint navigation (may not matter to you because you can use google maps). Neither price includes extended warranty or any discounts you may receive from your job which may be comparable on both providers. In my opinion it isnt a big enough difference. I think others should let OP know what they think if he hasn't made a purchase already.
|
|
||||
Re: What is a better phone HTC EVO or HTC THUNDERBOLT?
Quote:
|
|
||||
Re: What is a better phone HTC EVO or HTC THUNDERBOLT?
Quote:
|
This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
Like someone said, you can't compare a recently released phone with one thats been out for over a year. As far as coverage there is no need to start comparing. Some people have great coverage with verizon and some with sprint. My friends lives in an area that only verizon has coverage. I live in an area that has both verizon and sprint so I choose sprint due to lower prices. So it all depends which company works for you.
As far as phone comparison I guess when your ready to buy a phone compare it to the closest release date phone, and if the closest phone to compare is as old as a year then it's most likely the newest phone has more memory and more gpu processing power. Sent from my Evo using Tapatalk Full Body Protection for your smartphone or tablet http://stealthguards.com/idevaffilia...ate.php?id=417 |
|
||||
Re: What is a better phone HTC EVO or HTC THUNDERBOLT?
From my understanding, spec wise those phones are basically the same. The AT&T Desire, Evo and Thunderbolt are all basically the same phone, but customized for each carrier (as just about all phones in the U.S. are).
Once you talk about the 4G though, it's a whole different game. It's sort of unfair as Verizon 4G is newer as they are started later. But it's also the name of the game. In think Sprint made a mistake with WiMAX and going too early and that with it they go away from all the other LTE networks in the U.S touted as 4G. They'll have a tougher time getting certain phones because of this. Sprint has also been hitting quite a bit of road blocks for expanding their 4G network because the issue with Clear (which I hear is very close to bankruptcy). To be honest, nothing beats Verizon for coverage at a Nationwide scale. I have a Sprint phone and a Verizon blackberry for work. Both at @ 3G. In my experience, Sprint's network vs. Verizon's kinda sucks. Last edited by hceuterpe; 05-18-2011 at 12:43 PM. |
|
|
|