|
||||
Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
Quote:
__________________
On On U of K!!!! Sammy GS4 - ATT - Clean Rom - Xposed Mod
|
This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
Thanks. What did u like about cfs that made u like it better than bfs? are there major differences between the two?
|
|
||||
I use setcpu. I've tried cfs and bfs, to be honest I can't tell much difference if any.
Edit: I take that back..bfs seems a bit smoother. Best advice try both and see what you like best. Sent from my Evo using Tapatalk.
__________________
HTC Evo
ROM: Calkulin's EViO 2 Froyo v.1.5 Kernel: Netarchy's 4.2 CFS HAVS MORE SMARTASS UNIV. |
This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
Supposedly CFS is just as fast as BFS in 2.2. That is the reason Google didn't include it. Others have said that they don't agree. I didn't notice any difference. YMMV
|
|
||||
Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
Quote:
Its already included. |
This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
personally I have found cfs to be smoother overall, but it could have just been a non clean flash of bfs.
__________________
If I helped you feel free to buy me a beer https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/websc...=H82G7AW4ZWC5Q
|
|
||||
Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
Quote:
|
This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
|
|