![]() |
netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
ok. im fairly new to these custom kernels, so i hope no one starts calling me names.... i just installed the "netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed" kernel on the 8-19-10 sprint lovers rom. by the way, great job everyone who put their work into all these things!
so how do i go on about customizing, overclocking, or just plain messing around with the kernel (possible?). im not sure if its a menu, or a setting, or do i have to get something from the market? pretty much what im trying to say is - I installed it, now what(what can i do with it)? thanks in advance :lol: ps. almost forgot- they said it made the audio louder? is it already like that or do i have to do something to make it louder |
Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
Quote:
|
Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
Thanks. What did u like about cfs that made u like it better than bfs? are there major differences between the two?
|
I use setcpu. I've tried cfs and bfs, to be honest I can't tell much difference if any.
Edit: I take that back..bfs seems a bit smoother. Best advice try both and see what you like best. Sent from my Evo using Tapatalk. |
Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
Supposedly CFS is just as fast as BFS in 2.2. That is the reason Google didn't include it. Others have said that they don't agree. I didn't notice any difference. YMMV
|
Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
Quote:
Its already included. |
Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
Quote:
|
Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
personally I have found cfs to be smoother overall, but it could have just been a non clean flash of bfs.
|
Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
Quote:
|
Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2012 - PPCGeeks.com