netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
 

ok. im fairly new to these custom kernels, so i hope no one starts calling me names.... i just installed the "netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed" kernel on the 8-19-10 sprint lovers rom. by the way, great job everyone who put their work into all these things!

so how do i go on about customizing, overclocking, or just plain messing around with the kernel (possible?). im not sure if its a menu, or a setting, or do i have to get something from the market?

pretty much what im trying to say is - I installed it, now what(what can i do with it)?

thanks in advance :lol:

ps. almost forgot- they said it made the audio louder? is it already like that or do i have to do something to make it louder

Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
 

I prefer cfs to bfs, but to each his own. If you want to overclock get overclock widget or setcpu from the market. Look around for profile settings, I told mine the other day on here. You can underclock when screen off for saving batt and overclock when screen on for performance.

Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
 

Thanks. What did u like about cfs that made u like it better than bfs? are there major differences between the two?

I use setcpu. I've tried cfs and bfs, to be honest I can't tell much difference if any.


Edit: I take that back..bfs seems a bit smoother.
Best advice try both and see what you like best.
Sent from my Evo using Tapatalk.

Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
 

Supposedly CFS is just as fast as BFS in 2.2. That is the reason Google didn't include it. Others have said that they don't agree. I didn't notice any difference. YMMV

Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
 

Its already included.

Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
 

thanks, i wasnt sure :drunken:

Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
 

personally I have found cfs to be smoother overall, but it could have just been a non clean flash of bfs.

Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
 

You phone newb!! OMG, this is common knowledge! Thanks for wasting cyberspace. HEHEHEHE J/K! :lol: There is a lot to learn about Android development which is common knowledge to some but greek to others.

Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
 

what hiccups did you have with bfs?

Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
 

I flashed the bfs and it removed some of my installed apps and would not let me redownload them. Anyone have this issue. I am running the the rom in my signature.

Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
 

mostly keyboard input DRAGGED

Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
 

thats weird. i am running BFS and I dont get any lag on the keyboard. My data speeds are almost double compared to CFS also :headbang:

Boot into recovery wipe cache, and dalvik cache should clear your problem


Sent from my Evo using Tapatalk.

Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
 

*shrug* I am using the fresh compatible versions if that makes a difference.

Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
 

Thanks will try that out.

Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
 

BFS ran like crap on my device (really laggy) flashed to CFS and it works fine

Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
 

Had the same experience. While my OC was more stable, things like dragging items and keyboard input was horrible. It was very noticeable when you first powered the phone on. It was like it took it a few seconds to get going. I don't run OC'd on a daily basis anyway, so CFS has been a much better option for me.

Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
 

yes .. i left it like that for an hour or so just seemed to get worse thru time .. now on CFS and working normaly ...

Pardon the n00b question .. whats OC?

Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
 

Overclock=oc http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overclocking

Re: netarchy-toastmod-4.1.8-bfs-bfq-signed
 

Ohh Duh lol .. thanks