|
|
||||
Excellent work CopyCounsler,
I find it interesting that you've discovered that it's favorable batterywise to use no PHM instead of scaling. It sounds like in this case - XCPUScalar's "hibernate" feature is preferable. Also - when your automated combination is running, we're unable to slide out the keyboard or rotate the screen? Is that correct? Finally, Maxx134 asserted that the previously stated lower clockspeeds in PHM are superior to 624 in XCPUscalar. Is that through benchmarking I assume? |
|
||||
Whenever LumosII or LumosIII is running, it locks the screen display to whatever it is currently on. All keyboard slide events are ignored and do not change the perspective. The button on HTC Home will still do it on a click but the event is in turn broken with the use of lumos. (Which actually I've found to be appealing because when i quick want to text someone, I used to flip the keyboard and give it a breather before I go and type -- but now, I just crank away and no missed letters)
I've got some more scaling tests to do with PHM and will have the results posted soon (I hope) -- then its off to XCPU testing for a final verdict. Also I'm experimenting with the PHM "autoscale CPU disable" /feature/ to see how it acts on battery/performance consumption. More to come... Copy EDIT: forgot to mention, I'm going to hook my multimeter up tonight and measure "downtime" in realtime to test the ("XCPUScalar's "hibernate" feature is preferable.") is actually preferable or not... Last edited by CopyCounsler; 01-23-2008 at 02:53 PM. |
|
||||
Sweet. I love how thorough you're being, especially with the multimeter. I'd love to see multimeter comparisons between active use as well as dormant.
Right now, I could go either way between PHM and XCPU but I'm leaning towards staying with XCPUScalar longterm because of stability - and perhaps battery life. Battery life will be key, I think. |
|
||||
Quote:
Both the : (546Mhz,273b,137m,68lcd) AND the (572Mhz,286b,143m,72lcd) are faster simply because of the higher Bus speed than stock208.. None of my 3 refurbs were ever able to reach 624Mhz though, so for newer refurbs this seems to be the best setting. If you have Xcpuscalar or PHM and want to experience less process/ram, and Ma overhead while overclocked, you also can try this: Connect 6700 to USB external power (either to comp or power supply) Run your favorite overclock program Set highest stable speed. Close overclock program Run "CPU-ID".(to verify still overclocked while plugged in) I do this whenever synced and also when using "Internet Sharing" I havent measured sync performance but it is faster ![]() Your unit reverts back to normal when you disconnect from external power... Last edited by Maxx134; 01-24-2008 at 09:48 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
|