View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-23-2008, 08:41 AM
PolloLoco's Avatar
PolloLoco
Regular 'Geeker
Offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 290
Reputation: 135
PolloLoco is keeping up the good workPolloLoco is keeping up the good work
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Excellent work CopyCounsler,

I find it interesting that you've discovered that it's favorable batterywise to use no PHM instead of scaling. It sounds like in this case - XCPUScalar's "hibernate" feature is preferable.

Also - when your automated combination is running, we're unable to slide out the keyboard or rotate the screen? Is that correct?

Finally, Maxx134 asserted that the previously stated lower clockspeeds in PHM are superior to 624 in XCPUscalar. Is that through benchmarking I assume?
Reply With Quote