MIGHTY and JUICY

sdafasdlkfj · #1 (**permalink**) 11-18-2008, 12:56 PM

Guys--

I'm at a standstill and need help. I'm looking at the latest versions of both the Juicy and Mighty ROMS and they seem very similar.

I would like your input on what some key differences are between these two roms. So far, it seems as if these are the most popular roms available for the Diamond.

Please don't insult either of the two, they both work hard to make this possible. I don't want to turn this into a "which one is better thread," rather, I'd like to know what the key differences are and why some of you prefer one to the other.

Again, please don't insult anyone's diligent work.

Thank you,

Charles

pixelwix · #2 (**permalink**) 11-18-2008, 01:00 PM

post like these almost always turn into a flame war. Just install either one and try it out for yourself. Its not that hard if you going to know which rom will work better for you within 24hours of installing (atleast i know i do). I hate threads that alway ask people to make up their minds for them. I'm not bashing you here... its just simple try them both out!!!!

sdafasdlkfj · #3 (**permalink**) 11-18-2008, 01:04 PM

I'm not asking anyone to make up my mind for me. It seems that the ROMS are basically the same, and if anyone has input on what the differences are, please share.

Thanks.

daryelv · #4 (**permalink**) 11-18-2008, 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sdafasdlkfj

Guys--

Again, please don't insult anyone's diligent work.

Thank you,

Charles

This can totally turn into a flame war... basically the ROMs are very similar. Since you're going to flash, you might as well load one up, play with it for 30 mins or so and get a "feel" for it and then load up the other and do that same. You don't need to load your customizations to get a "feel" for a rom. For instance, I never liked the "feel" of nueROM on my Titan, but it's a great ROM for the Titan. For my Diamond I create my own ROMs for what I think "feels" best.

One thing that I liked about MSR.... loved the Mighty Mouse screen... (I personally have Tigger on my welcome splash).

Daryel

sdafasdlkfj · #5 (**permalink**) 11-18-2008, 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by daryelv

This can totally turn into a flame war... basically the ROMs are very similar. Since you're going to flash, you might as well load one up, play with it for 30 mins or so and get a "feel" for it and then load up the other and do that same. You don't need to load your customizations to get a "feel" for a rom. For instance, I never liked the "feel" of nueROM on my Titan, but it's a great ROM for the Titan. For my Diamond I create my own ROMs for what I think "feels" best.

One thing that I liked about MSR.... loved the Mighty Mouse screen... (I personally have Tigger on my welcome splash).

Daryel

Input like Daryel's is much appreciated. Thanks, bud.

**MightyMike** · #6 (**permalink**) 11-18-2008, 01:15 PM

Like everyone is saying it's all personal preference, certain things different in my rom would be feautures like smaller icons within the programs & settings pages, thicker scroll bars of easier touch movement, a bunch of registry edits which are almost primarily the same between msr and juicy rom. Juicy has just implemented an iphone spoof in the opera browser so it thinks your phone is an iphone and iphone specific webpages loadup like urmm.... the iphone lol... Cool feature although java isn't working 100% which hinders that feature in certain areas. MSR has call history & calendar tabs which juicy does not implement.

Those are some of the differences...

sdafasdlkfj · #7 (**permalink**) 11-18-2008, 01:24 PM

Mr. Mike:

Do you update drivers and 'stuff'?

**jakdillard** · #8 (**permalink**) 11-18-2008, 02:11 PM

Well lets put it like this both have a different flare to them however neither give you the true benefit of the windows mobile version that they chose to use .... what i have seen is that the use a mixture of xips and sys which for short term use seems very stable but in long terms where are the benefits of the updates besides the different registry tweaks that they both offer like for instance most of you thought that 20294 was broke when in actuality it changed slightly and the correct xip would benefit this build to support its stability .... not to bash just giving my input so take this to be constructive

**Mr. X** · #9 (**permalink**) 11-18-2008, 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jakdillard

Well lets put it like this both have a different flare to them however neither give you the true benefit of the windows mobile version that they chose to use .... what i have seen is that the use a mixture of xips and sys which for short term use seems very stable but in long terms where are the benefits of the updates besides the different registry tweaks that they both offer like for instance most of you thought that 20294 was broke when in actuality it changed slightly and the correct xip would benefit this build to support its stability .... not to bash just giving my input so take this to be constructive

20924 was broken it was missing stuff., had to be ported form an older sys. it wasn't an official release and i think it had a time bomb in it. i could be wrong tho.

we are working on 20759 now tho

**jakdillard** · #10 (**permalink**) 11-18-2008, 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juggalo_X

20924 was broken it was missing stuff., had to be ported form an older sys. it wasn't an official release and i think it had a time bomb in it. i could be wrong tho.

we are working on 20759 now tho

the version of it that I found came from xda there was nothing wrong with it except I just could never find a "true" source for it .... I'm using 20931 never really found a "official" source for it but it works one bug but nothing that is a deal breaker