Re: Sprint is no good!
I love my touch pro, which Sprint sent as a replacement for my defective mogul, which was a warranty replacement for my two year old Apache.
I recently flashed it with the latest Y4J rom, and it runs fantastic. The 1.07.00 radio as well. Hardly ever falls out of EVDO here in socal.
Sprint isnt perfect, but no carrier is. I find with sprint especially, a good attitude towards CSR when you are having any kind of issue yields a greater return than expected. No new phone is going "be perfect and solve all your issues", there simply wont be that device. My main gripe about the TP, is the charging/tethering issue, I wish the circuit was built that the phone would charge and use external power when connected, instead of drawing off the battery while the battery is getting charged. But other than that, its a fantastic phone. The speakers could be better, but hey. It does everything else exceptionally well. No one believes the pictures I take are with the phone, and not a digital camera.
I originally had pacbell digital PCS service back in '98, until 2002. Initially service was alright, except for thurs and fri afternoons driving home on the freeway. Most dialed #s would end up with the message "We're sorry, we are unable to complete your call at this time, please try the number later and call again.." And it pretty much went downhill from there. They rebadged it as cingular, now of course its At&t, and the only thing that has increased are the fees and advertising. Their signal still sucks everywhere. "Fewer bars in more places!" Should be there motto. Coming to Sprint in 2002, it was like night and day. "You mean I actually get signal after walking into a building, elevator, or going into a data center? WOW!" And Ive never looked back.
I tested a number of different PDA and smartphones this past year from AT&T and Verizon, and was actually given the same "model" from each carrier. Sprint wasnt part of the evaluation, so I just used my phone as benchmark. Anyways, the Verizon versions performed flawlessly, always great signal. The Q9C actually had a fantastic speakerphone, and always had good signal. The being locked down part sucked, couldnt make google maps work. I dont understand why Verizon feels the need to be draconian in regards to phone features. The probably support Obama's health care plan as well. But I also tried the similar AT&T smartphone, believe it was the blackjack, and it was a piece of junk, reception wise, just like my AT&T work cell. I cant use the phone in half this building.
Im amazed how many people are drawn to the iphone, when it only recently got such necessary features as copy/paste, especially when its on the worst cell provider possible. But then again, apple users tend to overlook lack of features and high prices, in homage to the almighty apple. That seems to go hand in hand. I still dont even have an ipod yet, though Im considering one since my car has OEM ipod integration, might be usefull! Its a pretty phone, dont get me wrong, the UI is beautiful, and for the technologically challenged, it does a good job. But once the glitter and gloss wears off, you begin to realize your limitations with it. Id be tempted to get one if Sprint carried one, but at the same time, Id feel torn because I love the winmo OS, and the flexibility it provides. Id probably replace my wife's BB with the iphone if it were an option, only because she'd enjoy it.
Anyways, sorry to hear that sprint and the touch pro have performed so unitarily terrible for you, I guess you'll just have to deal with the ETF, and find a new carrier!
|