2.3 GingerBread

lioncat55 · #1 (**permalink**) 12-11-2010, 08:07 AM

i am remember how long it took to get 2.2 on to our phones dose any one have any clue how long it might take to get 2.3. i am not looking for a solid date just some thing in the relm of a months and no a "few months" dose not work i am thinking like a month or 2 in terms of time

**arrrghhh** · #2 (**permalink**) 12-11-2010, 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lioncat55

i am remember how long it took to get 2.2 on to our phones dose any one have any clue how long it might take to get 2.3. i am not looking for a solid date just some thing in the relm of a months and no a "few months" dose not work i am thinking like a month or 2 in terms of time

Well as I recall, froyo didn't take all that long to port... once AOSP was available for it. They've only released the SDK for 2.3, that does us no good...

Hopefully when AOSP is made available, it'll only take a few tweaks to get us up to speed... Assuming there isn't some huge limitation, which I can't imagine there would be but I do hear they changed a lot on the backend of things... Which may or may not help.

**boredandtattooed** · #3 (**permalink**) 12-11-2010, 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lioncat55

and no, a "few months" does not work. i am thinking like a month or 2 in terms of time

well geez man, I sure hope we can fit YOUR time table..

LAME!

superx10 · #4 (**permalink**) 12-11-2010, 07:15 PM

I am more or less waiting for a fully working android port. version number doesn't matter as much

**natemcnutty** · #5 (**permalink**) 12-12-2010, 12:19 AM

Wirelessly posted (Opera/9.80 (Windows Mobile; Opera Mini/5.1.21594/22.401; U; en) Presto/2.5.25 Version/10.54)

Quote:

Originally Posted by boredandtattooed

Quote:

Originally Posted by lioncat55

and no, a "few months" does not work. i am thinking like a month or 2 in terms of time

well geez man, I sure hope we can fit YOUR time table..

LAME!

yeah, I'm hoping things just got lost in translation there. Demanding free work from developers, especially on a timetable, is a real jerk move. If you were paying them $2000 to do it in 1 month, and they agreed to do it, then you can get pushy (though I still wouldn't recommend it)

pts69666 · #6 (**permalink**) 12-12-2010, 07:34 PM

doesn't are device not meet the minimum specs for gingerbread?

sprinttouch666 · #7 (**permalink**) 12-12-2010, 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pts69666

doesn't are device not meet the minimum specs for gingerbread?

there are no minimum specs/requirements

southernSTYLE · #8 (**permalink**) 12-13-2010, 01:11 AM

Hey listen here, I need Gingerbread ported to my Touch Pro 2, Touch Pro 3, laptop, iPod Touch (4g-- because the model matters), my PC, my TV and to my dog.. in 3 days, get to it Devs.. idc if you have lives/jobs outside of this internet machine I need something that's not even released on my phone now!!

amidoinitrite?

lioncat55 · #9 (**permalink**) 12-13-2010, 05:04 AM

you guys make me laugh i am not trying to make them work faster i am wanting to know from a dev a relistic time frame for getting 2.3 if its going to be 6 months then so be it now i am also guessing that it will be a month mabey 2 before the devs have a idea of any kind on how long it will take

EGOvoruhk · #10 (**permalink**) 12-13-2010, 05:48 AM

First ask Google when they'll release the 2.3 source code. Until then, no work can be done

I don't know why you think it would take 2 months before the devs have any idea of how long it will take. The XDAndroid folks had a 2.2 port running within a week of the source code's release